Latest Shouts In The Shoutbox -- View The Shoutbox
The shoutbox is currently offline!

[ Smilies | BBCodes ]

     
 
Click Here and visit PuPPs FREE StuFF

This website contains controversial information that may be disturbing to some viewers.
The theories, conclusions and commentaries are presented in an attempt to reveal the hidden truths.
It is up to the viewer to determine what they choose to believe after evaluating all available sources of information.

 
     

NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
Does your government represent your best interests?


     
 
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
~ Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.



POLITICAL ART GALLERY



IMPORTANT TOPICS

1. U.S. NEWS MEDIA CAN LEGALLY LIE TO YOU
There is no law preventing the U.S. news media from intentionally lying to the public. Whistle blowers and honest reporters are fired for telling the truth.

2. FLUORIDE IS A TOXIN/POISON
Read the Poison Warning label on your toothpaste, then call the 800# and ask;
"Why do you put poison in my toothpaste?"

3. NEW FLU VACCINE IS LOADED WITH MERCURY
by Dr. Joseph Mercola

4. PEDOPHILES IN HIGH PLACES
Also: Conspiracy of Silence Video

5. ASPARTAME IS HARMFUL
Equal, Nutra-Sweet and over 6000 food and beverage products contain Aspartame

6. On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 (2 Trillion) in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for.
Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the [9/11] attack on the World Trade Center and The Pentagon the following morning would assure that the story remained buried.


http://drinkingwaterlosangeles.com
Serving the greater Los Angeles area,
Los Angeles Drinking Water is proud to offer Reverse Osmosis filtration systems
that remove trace elements such as arsenic, mercury, lead and fluoride
which are known to be in Los Angeles tap water according to
the 2013 DWP Water Quality report.
POLITICAL ART GALLERY









"If our nation is ever taken over, it will be taken over from within."
~ James Madison, President of the United States

Pages: (24) « First ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> STRANGE SKULLS, Photo Gallery and Research Archives


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 4 2004, 06:24 PM
Quote Post
Skull found at Sanders Mound in Texas

user posted image

Thanx Tex, that sure does look very similar to some of the south american skulls.

But not as pronounced as the Eyptian and the Summerian.

Do you know approximately what year or century this person lived?


QUOTE
I will try to retrieve some images from a professional collector group I belong to.These are the tablets containing the protowriting of the Adena culture which resemble Old World artifacts from the Neolithic.


Cool, I love this kind of stuff!






--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Truth Seeker
***
Group: Members
Posts: 142
Member No.: 266
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 4 2004, 11:51 PM
Quote Post
I love this skulls like this have been a passion for me. Wonderful contributions.

Hereís a take on Kiya.

There is a story that Drunvalo Melchizedek tells it fits into both the timeline and the elongated skulls. Canít find any links so forgive me if I miss some parts itís late.
Originally there were a Lemurian couple Ay and Tiya (not Kiya, Iíll suggest that was her name, there is a later Kiya, however I think who you are looking for is Tiya probably some historic confusion) who became physically immortal beings prior to the sinking of that continent. Reputedly they started they Naacal Mystery School teaching ascension to others. They did a whole lot of other stuff thatís not important here for the sake of this story, in Atlantis.

This is where they come in to the Egyptian pantheon. As the Egyptians began to loose their consciousness of one God (remember as a stair step evolutionary kind of place they were falling asleep again). They needed to have a Christ consciousness being walk the earth to put the real thing back into the Akashic record. So Ay and Tiya were enlisted to create a child, they did this with some type of high level trans dimensional sex. Akhunaton was their child. He was only given about 17 Ĺ years to make his imprint around 1355 B.C. Everyone hated him. He disrupted all religions telling everyone that priests were not necessary and that God was within them. My kind of guy. He also was a total pacifist and told all the armies to stop fighting, he ordered them to stay inside their borders and only respond if directly attacked. The People hated him, however it did not matter because he got all this into the Akashic record. he and his followers were reputedly a members of the Tat brotherhood who later migrated to the Masada and became the Essenes.

I'll be back with some other stuff later~just a late night story for now ;-)




--------------------
When freedom is outlawed, only the outlaw will be free.
PMEmail Poster
Top


Truth Seeker
***
Group: Members
Posts: 142
Member No.: 266
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 12:01 AM
Quote Post
user posted image


This bust was labled Queen Tiya, the Elder Lady




--------------------
When freedom is outlawed, only the outlaw will be free.
PMEmail Poster
Top
BJ1


Unregistered




Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 08:21 AM
Quote Post
Akhenaten is principally famous for his religious reforms, where the polytheism of Egypt was to be supplanted by monotheism centered around Aten, the god of the solar disc. This was possibly a move to lessen the political power of the Priests. Now the Pharaoh, not the priesthood, was the sole link between the people and Aten which effectively ended the power of the various temples.

Akhenaten built a temple to his god Aten immediately outside the east gate of the temple of Amun at Karnak, but clearly the coexistence of the two cults could not last. He therefore proscribed the cult of Amun, closed the god's temples, took over the revenues. He then sent his officials around to destroy Amun's statues and to desecrate the worship sites. These actions were so contrary to the traditional that opposition arose against him. The estates of the great temples of Thebes, Memphis and Heliopolis reverted to the throne. Corruption grew out of the mismanagement of such large levies.

It was said that one day Akhenaten had a vision wherein he saw a sun disc between two mountains. He felt that God was guiding him to make change. He was shown the God, Aten, as the Sun Disk - the Light. He felt guided by Aten to build a city between the two mountains.

In the sixth year of his reign Akhenaten rejected the Gods of Thebes. They were never part of his childhood anyway since he had been shunned as a child. Akhenaten had declared for the first time in recorded that there was only one God - the concept of monotheism. Overnight he turned 2,000 years of Egyptian religious upside down...

(This is a really good site if you are interested in Akhenaten, Nefertiti, their children, and lots of pics.)

http://www.crystalinks.com/akhenaten.html

BJ




Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 08:58 AM
Quote Post
scratchinghead.gif I think that I read something like that somewhere Prue. There were two or three old books that I had read that had similar stories in them. I can't remember the names oft he books though.

There is a Tiya mentioned in some of the texts and she was one of Ramesses II sisters. If I remember correctly, Ramesses II had red hair, which may be another reason why members of the royal families chose to shave their heads and wear wigs.

Tiya was definitely a Queen and the daughter of Yuya and Tjuyu. Tjuyu, her mother was a descendent of Ahmose Nefertari and her father Yuya, may have been of Asiatic descent according to one account.

They had another daughter named Tiy who was Queen of Amenhotep III. Tiy was the mother of Akhenaton. Yuya and Tjuyu also had two sons who were named Anen and Ay.

Yuya and Tjuyu were also the Maternal Great Grandparents of Ankhesenamun.

QUOTE
Maternal Great Grandparents: Yuya and Tuya (both non-royal). Yuya has been sometimes characterized as a foreigner because of his unusual name, but I disagree with this. He was nonroyal, but held high religious post and was Commander of the King's horses, chariots, and stables. Tuya apparently was head of Amun's harem in Thebes and head of Min's harem in their home city of Akhmin. It is thought that Tuya was a sister of Queen Mutemwiya, and therefore a decendent of Queen Aahmose-Nefertari, the ancestor of all Tuthmosid Queens. The offspring of Yuya and Tuya were sons Anen and Ay, and a daughter Tiy.


http://www.angelfire.com/ne2/TiaDuat/genealogy.html

There is of course an Ay and Tiya mentioned by Melchizedek.

QUOTE
Lemuria, Atlantis, and The Naacal Mystery Schools 

About 80,000 years ago, a couple named Ay and Tiya achieved Ascension and founded the Naacal Mystery School in Lemuria - a gentle, magnificent empire that stretched from the Himalayas to way past Easter Island and portions of South America. Not long before the main continent of Lemuria sank, Ay and Tiya gathered over a thousand Immortal Masters and migrated to the island of Undal in Atlantis. They divided the island into four quadrants corresponding to the male-female/logical-intuitive functions of Mind and began projecting ten magnetic vortices in the Tree of Life pattern onto the main island of Atlantis. These magnetic 'hotspots' drew vast numbers of Lemurian migrants who settled around vortices that resonated with their own inner natures. Soon, cities grew over eight of the ten vortices. Two were left uninhabited because the masculine-logical energies they accentuated had yet to arise in the largely feminine-intuitive Lemurian consciousness.


PMEmail Poster
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 09:19 AM
Quote Post
blink.gif Thanx for the image of the Skull Tex and Pupp. It is definitely an unusual specimin with a significantly larger brain capacity, probably around the 2000 cc range. Very similar to a Neanderthal skull and definitely human. The skull has all the right bones and sutures. It is very similar to Akhenaten's skull and doesn't show any evidence of deformation. The one difference that I just noticed with Akhenaten's skull is that the occipital bone, which is supposed to be on the back of the head is on the bottom. Very peculiar.

Actually... Now that I can see both skulls, both their occipital bones are not where they're supposed to be so they both appear to be very close in comparison.

user posted image
Akhenaten's skull


I finally found a good example of a cradle-board skull that came from China BTW.

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image


PMEmail Poster
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 10:05 AM
Quote Post
I was looking for a Neanderthal skull for comparison and came up with this interesting bit of information. whistling.gif

Neanderthal fraud discovered by Dr. Jack Cuozzo La Quina

QUOTE
In his book "Buried Alive - The startling truth about Neanderthal man" Dr. Jack Cuozzo shows how many Neanderthal fossils have been tampered with to support the theory of evolution.

This page will examine many of these skulls.

One of the many fraudulent things that people have done to the Neanderthal skulls is to reconstruct the lower jaw in a forward protruding position.

This is based on the preconceived notion, that Neanderthal was dimwitted, and ape-ish. The jaw is purposely manipulated to look this way in reconstructionís, because that is how some ape jaws are aligned.

Of the thousands of people who have seen Neanderthal skulls in a museum, I wonder how many of them knew the jaw had been altered?

In his book on Neanderthal man titled: "Buried Alive: The startling truth about Neanderthal man", Dr. Jack Cuozzo reveals the truth about the Neanderthals jaw.

Dr. Cuozzo adds:

"The exact same thing happened with the famous La Chapelle-aux-Saints skull and jaws" (reference #1 pg. 40)

What effect did this change have? The manipulation totally changed the interpretation of the skull. When the jaw was placed in the correct position

"This was also a new non-ape position for the lower jaw." (reference #1, pg. 40).
With the jaw in the correct position it was clear that Neanderthal was not an ape man.

The La Quina V skull has also been altered.


http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/lemoustier.html

One of my sister's was working on the hypothesis that Neanderthals didn't die out but somehow managed to survive, due to their above normal brain capacity and blend in.

This is a comparison of a normal human child's skull to that of a Neanderthal child's skull:

http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/staff/zolli/CAP/Pi...der+sapiens.jpg

Oh and it seems that Neanderthals had canibalistic tendencies. Either that or somebody else ate them.

Photographs for Moula Neanderthal Cannibalism Story
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/release...eandphotos.html

user posted image
user posted image

Here is a comparison of a normal human skull and a Neanderthal skull. Note the longer braincase and the tilt of the occipital bone. It would be more likely that the Egyptian royal clan were somehow related to the Neanderthals than normal humans.

QUOTE
The braincase in modern humans is relatively shorter, and the forehead rounder and higher. This is the result of the brain being housed higher-up and further forward in modern humans than in Neanderthals. This can be seen in the two photographs above. Track the plane of the forehead from the top of the orbits. The slope of the forehead for the modern human is nearly vertical, while there is a noticeably lower slope for the Neanderthal to the right.


PMEmail Poster
Top


Anarchaeologist
****
Group: Members
Posts: 489
Member No.: 303
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 10:18 AM
Quote Post
Seralia thanks for posting Akhenaton's skull for comparison; I think the similarity is remarkable. Well actually not that remarkable as Cyclone Covey has shown linguistic simitlarities in the Atakapan language of the Texas Gulf coast and Ancient Egyptian. The Atakapans were best represented by the abnormaly large and powerful Karankawas who rescued Cabeza De Vaca's shipwrecked crew on the Texas coast in the 1520's. These are people you might want to look at in relation to Giants in America although they are not the red haired giants of Nevada who were exterminatied by the Paiutes around 800 AD. These people, the Karankawas were well over six feet tall and their long bows could not be drawn by the average European. An early Texas account tells of a Karankawa shooting an arrow completely through a black bear at 600 yards and that story was by no means unique. The Karankawas were finally exterminated in the 1840's because of their practice of stealing children and eating them. This was not a practice limited to the Karankawas and the Tonkawas who were infamous for their non ritual cannibalism aided the destruction of the Comanches who shunned any form of cannibalism and were waging a genocidal war against the Tonkawa.

Now recently Federico Solorzano presented a fragment of Homo Erectus skull and jaw found at Lake Chapala, Mexico to a conference of anthropologists in September. This is not the first primitive skull to be found in the Americas and two others from Brazil were labeled hoaxes back in the Monte Verde debates. They are not hoaxes in my opinion and there are several sites such as the El Horno site in Mexico which produced 250,000 year old dates which ruined the careers of three people. These sites are now being reexaminined. Many such as the rejected Calico site are in the Mojave Desert of California. I will go into greater depth on these as this discussion progresses. We must start with a blank slate now because it has long been obvious that the present paradigm is intentionally false. I'm sorry I could not retrieve the Adena tablet but it had sunk too far back in the threads to access. I do have an Adena calender image I will send PuPP to post here that is even more impressive.

Mayslick Kentucky Calendar Stone

user posted image

Is Drumvalo Melchisedek the author of Keys to Enoch? And do you recommend that book as containing valid information?


PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 10:28 AM
Quote Post
This almost reads like a description of the british Royal Family. rolleyes.gif

Neanderthals Reconstructed - Not Human Ancestors!

LONDON August 1, 2001 (Reuters) - Computer graphics of Neanderthals based on ancient fossils show they were very different from early humans and did not mix with them, Swiss scientists said Wednesday.

The virtual reality images of reconstructed Neanderthal skulls have distinctive features established very early in childhood which did not develop gradually through life, suggesting they coexisted but did not breed with each other.

"This is a strong argument for early separation on the species level, which means they had isolated populations. There might have been some accidental inbreeding but certainly not a big exchange of genes,'' said Christoph Zollikofer, a neurobiologist at the University of Zurich.

Zollikofer and Marcia Ponce de Leon, computer scientist and anthropologist at the university, created virtual reality models of Neanderthal skulls from 16 fossils of the creatures who lived in Europe, North Africa and Asia between 125,000 and 40,000 years ago.

They wanted to compare their development from childhood to that of early and modern humans.

They found that the distinctive features of the Neanderthal skull and face were there by the age of two years.

"We wanted to find out the basic development in Neanderthals in comparison to humans. It was a surprise to find how homogeneous these species behaved during development,'' Zollikofer added in a telephone interview.

The research, reported in the science journal Nature, supports earlier genetic evidence showing Neanderthals are too distant genetically to have been an ancestor of modern humans.

"We think that together with the genetic data ... it is quite reasonable to think that these are really two different species separated at least half a million years ago,'' said Zollikofer.

To construct the virtual reality images the scientists used computer tomography of the Neanderthal fossils to get three dimensional data and customized computer software to create the images.

"We now have a dynamic approach to the morphology (the study of forms). We can say something about how an extinct species developed from birth to adulthood,'' Zollikofer said.

Neanderthals differ from anatomically modern Homo sapiens in a suite of cranial features:

1. A low but elongated and broadened braincase

2. Characteristic cranial suprastructures such as a supraorbital torus, a small mastoid process, a large juxtamastoid eminence, and a suprainiac fossa

3. A large face with rounded orbits, an wide nasal aperture, an inflated paranasal region and an anteroposteriorly slanting infraorbital region

4. A mandible with a receding chin region and a retromolar space in adult individuals

On The Web:
Computer-assisted Paleoanthropology at the University of Zurich - http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/staff/zolli/CAP/Main_face.htm

http://home.earthlink.net/~exonews/xtra/neanderthals.htm


PMEmail Poster
Top


Anarchaeologist
****
Group: Members
Posts: 489
Member No.: 303
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 11:04 AM
Quote Post
PuPP the Adena calender stone is in your mail. When it is posted be sure to note the similarity to the ivory head of a woman and the Venus of Wilendorf figurines from the European Paleolithic.


PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 11:13 AM
Quote Post
They make Neanderthal appear to be as primative as possible but in reality, they were quite advanced.

Feature Article - September 1997
by Do-While Jones

The Neanderthal Problem

QUOTE
The more scientists learned about Neanderthal man, the more they realized he did not fit in with their theory very well. Apes supposedly got smarter as their brains gradually evolved in size from about 400 cc to modern man's 1350 cc brain.5 It was difficult to explain how a Neanderthal man, with his 1740 cc brain6, fit into this process.

The Neanderthal skeletons were found in graves with hands neatly folded, surrounded by fossilized pollen. This is a pretty clear indication that they were buried with flowers in some sort of funeral ceremony. Only humans do that. Furthermore, they found tools (and possibly a musical instrument7) associated with some of the Neanderthal remains. Every indication was that he was as fully human as Homo sapiens (modern man).

But worst of all was the time problem. According to the evolutionists' dating, Homo sapiens supposedly evolved 100,000 years ago.8 Some people even claim there is evidence of Homo sapiens in Australia 116,000 to 176,000 years ago.9 Neanderthal man supposedly lived from 36,000 to 75,000 years ago,10 or maybe as long as 82,000 years ago.11 Homo sapiens could not have evolved from Neanderthals if Homo sapiens were here first. Even if you assume that Neanderthals existed more than 176,000 years ago, but their fossils just haven't been discovered yet, that's still a problem because the theory requires the inferior species to die out for the superior species to evolve.


http://www.ridgenet.net/~do_while/sage/v1i12f.htm


Oh would you look at this. Red hair and Neanderthal charictoristics in the Egyptian Royal family. scoping.gif

Redheads 'are neanderthal'

Monday April 16, 2001
The Times, London

RED hair may be the genetic legacy of Neanderthals, scientists believe. Researchers at the John Radcliffe Institute of Molecular Medicine in Oxford say that the so-called "ginger gene" which gives people red hair, fair skin and freckles could be up to 100,000 years old.

They claim that their discovery points to the gene having originated in Neanderthal man who lived in Europe for 200,000 years before Homo sapien settlers, the ancestors of modern man, arrived from Africa about 40,000 years ago.

Rosalind Harding, the research team leader, said: "The gene is certainly older than 50,000 years and it could be as old as 100,000 years.

"An explanation is that it comes from Neanderthals." It is estimated that at least 10 percent of Scots have red hair and a further 40 per cent carry the gene responsible, which could account for their once fearsome reputation as fighters.

Neanderthals have been characterised as migrant hunters and violent cannibals who probably ate most of their meat raw. They were taller and stockier than Homo sapiens, but with shorter limbs, bigger faces and noses, receding chins and low foreheads.

The two species overlapped for a period of time and the Oxford research appears to suggests that they must have successfully interbred for the "ginger gene" to survive. Neanderthals became extinct about 28,000 years ago, the last dying out in southern Spain and southwest France.

http://www.n2.net/prey/bigfoot/hominids/redheads.htm

I'll drink to that. cheers.gif


PMEmail Poster
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 11:22 AM
Quote Post
Sureeeeeeeeeee they didn't interbreed. rolleyes.gif

N.Y. Times April 25, 1999

Discovery Suggests Humans Are a Bit Neanderthal

By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD

Neanderthals and modern humans not only coexisted for thousands of years long ago, as anthropologists have established, but now their little secret is out: they also cohabited.

At least that is the interpretation being made by paleontologists who have examined the 24,500-year-old skeleton of a young boy discovered recently in a shallow grave in Portugal. Bred in the boy's bones seemed to be a genetic heritage part Neanderthal, part early modern Homo sapiens. He was a hybrid, they concluded, and the first strong physical evidence of interbreeding between the groups in Europe.

"This skeleton demonstrates that early modern humans and Neanderthals are not all that different," said Dr. Erik Trinkaus, a paleoanthropologist at Washington University in St. Louis. "They intermixed, interbred and produced offspring."

Although some scientists disputed the interpretation, other scientists who study human origins said in interviews last week that the findings were intriguing, probably correct and certain to provoke debate and challenges to conventional thinking about the place of Neanderthals in human evolution.

Neanderthals and modern humans presumably were more alike than different, not a separate species or even subspecies, but two groups who viewed each other as appropriate mates.

Recent DNA research had appeared to show that the two people were unrelated and had not interbred. Neanderthals lived in Europe and western Asia from 300,000 years ago until the last of them disappeared on the Iberian peninsula about 28,000 years ago. In the prevailing theory today, modern humans arose in Africa less than 200,000 years ago and appeared in great numbers in Europe, starting about 40,000 years ago.

The new discovery could, at long last, resolve the question of what happened to the Neanderthals, the stereotypical stocky, heavy-browed "cave men." They may have merged with modern humans, called Cro-Magnons, who appear to have arrived in Europe with a superior tool culture. In that case, some Neanderthal genes survive in most Europeans and people of European descent.

The skeleton of the boy, buried with strings of marine shells and painted with red ocher, was uncovered in December by Portuguese archeologists led by Dr. Joo Zilhao, director of the Institute of Archeology in Lisbon. The discovery was made in the Lapedo Valley near Leiria, 90 miles north of Lisbon.

Realizing the potential significance, Dr. Zilhao called in Dr. Trinkaus, an authority on Neanderthal paleontology, who went to Lisbon and examined the bones in January.

The boy, who was about 4 years old at death, had the prominent chin and other facial characteristics of a fully modern human. But his stocky body and short legs were those of a Neanderthal. Dr. Trinkaus compared the limb proportions with Neanderthal skeletons, including some children. He said he was then sure of the skeleton's implications.

"It's a complex mosaic, which is what you get when you have a hybrid," Dr. Trinkaus said. "This is the first definite evidence of admixture between Neanderthals and European early modern humans."

The age of the skeleton, determined by radiocarbon dating, showed that full Neanderthals had apparently been extinct for at least 4,000 years before the boy was born. "This is no love child," Dr. Trinkaus said, meaning that this was not evidence of a rare mating but a descendant of generations of Neanderthal-Cro-Magnon hybrids.

Dr. Trinkaus and Dr. Zilhao have completed a more detailed scientific report to be published soon in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. DNA tests on the skeleton have not yet been done.

Other Neanderthal specialists reacted favorably to the discovery. Dr. Fred H. Smith of Northern Illinois University in De Kalb called it "very convincing and absolutely right."

Dr. Smith noted that he had come upon other skeletal material in central Europe that raised the possibility of interbreeding between the groups. Though most scholars in the field will probably accept the possibility of interbreeding, he said, a significant number will probably not.

The more ardent exponents of the out-of-Africa hypothesis of modern human origins may be holdouts. They have argued that early modern humans all emerged from Africa and wiped out the Neanderthal population in Europe. Whether the relationship was fraternal or genocidal has been much debated. But many have argued that the two groups were distinct, with humans displacing and probably slaughtering their rivals.

Dr. Chris Stringer, an expert on Neanderthals at the Museum of Natural History in London, who is a leader of the out-of-Africa forces, said that he was willing to consider the Portuguese findings with an open mind. He told The Associated Press that the current evidence was not sufficient to convince him of Dr. Trinkhaus's hybrid interpretation.

An alternative theory, known as regional continuity, holds that the earliest human ancestors arose in Africa and spread around the world more than a million years ago. Modern humans then emerged in different regions through separate evolution and interbreeding. A leading advocate of this theory is Dr. Milford Wolpoff, a paleontologist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

"This find should be devastating to the out-of-Africa people," Dr. Wolpoff said. "It shows their theory doesn't work, at least in Europe. And it shows that fundamentally, Neanderthals are the same species we are and they contributed their genes to European ancestry."

By now, scientists said, only a small fraction of Neanderthal genes have survived, the European gene pool having been further mixed through migrations during the spread of agriculture and invasions from the east.

But Dr. Wolpoff cautioned that it would take more than one skeleton to tell the effects of interbreeding apart from ordinary evolutionary changes, the result of genes modifying in response to environmental stresses.

Dr. Alan Mann, a specialist in human evolution at the University of Pennsylvania, called the Portuguese hybrid skeleton "some of the most important data we ever got about Neanderthals in human evolution," but said he was not sure that interbreeding had been established.

Dr. Trinkaus said the discovery "refutes strict replacement models of modern human origins" and also seemed to undermine interpretations of recent DNA research. Two years ago, Dr. Svante Paabo of the University of Munich in Germany, reported that a study of the genetic material DNA from Neanderthal remains and living humans indicated that Neanderthals did not interbreed with the modern humans.

At the time, scientists said the DNA results reinforced the idea that Neanderthals were a separate species from modern humans. If the new findings are correct, though, the two groups were probably more like different races of the same species.

"The problem with the DNA research was the interpretation," Dr. Trinkaus said. "It's demonstrably wrong. All that they showed is that Neanderthal biology is outside the range of living humans, not modern Homo sapiens back then."

Dr. Alan Templeton, an evolutionary geneticist at Washington University, said that some hybridization occurs without the effects showing up, for example, in mitochondrial DNA, which is passed only through the mother. "But if you look deep enough in evolutionary time, you find a lot of interbreeding," Dr. Templeton said. "That is what humanity is all about: we interbreed a lot."

http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Neanderthal.html



PMEmail Poster
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 583
Member No.: 223
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 11:44 AM
Quote Post
Neanderthals really didn't look that different.

user posted image

QUOTE
THIS COMPUTERIZED RECONSTRUCTION of a Neanderthal child's skull and face was generated by computer scientists at the University of Zurich by using computer graphics newly developed for this purpose.


PMEmail Poster
Top


Anarchaeologist
****
Group: Members
Posts: 489
Member No.: 303
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 12:02 PM
Quote Post
Seralia I'm glad you posted that last part because I was going to point out the obvious. If it is possible to interbreed humans wiil interbreed. And since Neanderthal was clearly human and not all that different it is inevitable that groups interbred. The Adena are the robust first wave of the North American civilizations that we have clear undisputed evidence of. Whenever you hear "robust" in anthropology always think "Big, and heavy boned". Now what is peculiar, I have found that when ever you find instances of these "Robust" people in North America you also have "Gracile" people which means practically speaking "pygmies'. I have a few of their artifacts photographed and they are contrary to the assertions of todays "experts" not suiltable for hunting large animals without poison on them. Any archery enthusiast will tell you arrows kill by exsanquination, that is they bleed the victim to death. Now these tiny paleoindian points won't even pierce a buffalo hide and probably not a camel or horse either. Yet the stories of the Comanches about the "Little People" state that their little darts never failed to be fatal. Sounds very much like people of the Ituri Forest and Kalahari Desert to me. I'm glad we have some people here deeper into osteology than I am. This thread is very educational for me. balance.gif


PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Oct 5 2004, 03:19 PM
Quote Post
Wow, I am always impressed and amazed when I come back to this thread.
Seralia, you are awesome!

Prue, thanks for joining in and contributing.

Tex, I got the email and didn't realize it was from you, so you can ignore my reply.

I inserted the Calendar stone into your post.

Here's a side by side comparison of...

Sanders Mound Texas Skull and Akhenaten Skull
user posted imageuser posted image

Seralia, those skulls found in china sure look different.

I'm going to throw in one of my whacky theories. We are all genetic results of interbreeding and creation from advanced beings who needed a strong slave race to mine the earth for minerals and to build the monuments.

There were several various species created, negroid, caucasoid and mongoloid seem to be the 3 dominant ones.

In reference to the little people - pygmies and such.

Think about this... if you were small and weak, wouldn't you need a strong and large race to perform all of the laborous tasks for you?

Just a theory mind you, carry on!

And thank you all for your wonderful contributions!











--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top

Topic OptionsPages: (24) « First ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... Last » Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.9781 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."
~ James A. Garfield, President of the United States


MORE POLITICAL ART

"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
~ Amschel Mayer Rothschild