Latest Shouts In The Shoutbox -- View The Shoutbox
The shoutbox is currently offline!

[ Smilies | BBCodes ]

     
 
Click Here and visit PuPPs FREE StuFF

This website contains controversial information that may be disturbing to some viewers.
The theories, conclusions and commentaries are presented in an attempt to reveal the hidden truths.
It is up to the viewer to determine what they choose to believe after evaluating all available sources of information.

 
     

NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
Does your government represent your best interests?


     
 
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
~ Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.



POLITICAL ART GALLERY



IMPORTANT TOPICS

1. U.S. NEWS MEDIA CAN LEGALLY LIE TO YOU
There is no law preventing the U.S. news media from intentionally lying to the public. Whistle blowers and honest reporters are fired for telling the truth.

2. FLUORIDE IS A TOXIN/POISON
Read the Poison Warning label on your toothpaste, then call the 800# and ask;
"Why do you put poison in my toothpaste?"

3. NEW FLU VACCINE IS LOADED WITH MERCURY
by Dr. Joseph Mercola

4. PEDOPHILES IN HIGH PLACES
Also: Conspiracy of Silence Video

5. ASPARTAME IS HARMFUL
Equal, Nutra-Sweet and over 6000 food and beverage products contain Aspartame

6. On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 (2 Trillion) in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for.
Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the [9/11] attack on the World Trade Center and The Pentagon the following morning would assure that the story remained buried.


http://drinkingwaterlosangeles.com
Serving the greater Los Angeles area,
Los Angeles Drinking Water is proud to offer Reverse Osmosis filtration systems
that remove trace elements such as arsenic, mercury, lead and fluoride
which are known to be in Los Angeles tap water according to
the 2013 DWP Water Quality report.
POLITICAL ART GALLERY









"If our nation is ever taken over, it will be taken over from within."
~ James Madison, President of the United States

  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Outrageous Gutting of Law Referencing Mind Control


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Nov 15 2003, 07:55 PM
Quote Post
The bill which was originally H.R. 2977, of the United States House of Representatives was to be extremely important to the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic or "psychotronic" mind control experimentation on involuntary citizens. The importance is that in this draft bill, the terms "PSYCHOTRONIC" and "MIND CONTROL" were clearly referenced. The ORIGINAL bill is presented first below.

Following the original bill, is the "gutted" bill which Rep. Kucinich will be presenting for passage.

QUOTE
Original Bill
Space Preservation Act of 2001
(Introduced in the House)
HR 2977 IH
107th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2977
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 2, 2001

Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned




A BILL

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001´.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.

Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.´.

SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.

The President shall--

(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and

(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.

SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.

The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.

SEC. 5. REPORT.

The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--

(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and

(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.

SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.

Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--

(1) space exploration;

(2) space research and development;

(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or

(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) The term `space´ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon´ and `weapons system´ mean a device capable of any of the following:

(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;

(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;

(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or

(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.

(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--

(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or

(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;

(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

© The term `exotic weapons systems´ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.





QUOTE
GUTTED Replacement Bill
Space Preservation Act of 2002
(Introduced in the House)
HR 3616 IH
107th CONGRESS - 2nd Session

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 23, 2002

Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ´Space Preservation Act of 2002´.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.

Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.´.

SEC. 3. BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT.

The President shall-- (1) implement a ban on space-based weapons of the United States and the use of weapons of the United States to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit; and (2) immediately order the termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States.

SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL TREATY BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT.

The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing an international treaty banning space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit.

SEC. 5. REPORT.

The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter, a report on-- (1) the implementation of the ban on space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit required by section 3; and (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the treaty described in section 4.

SEC. 6. SPACE-BASED NONWEAPONS ACTIVITIES.

Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for-- (1) space exploration; (2) space research and development; (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act: (1) The term ´space´ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space. (2) The terms `space-based weapon´ and `space-based system´ mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(A) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object or person; (B) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person; © directing a source of energy against that object or person; or (D) any other undeveloped means.



http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm


QUOTE
Commentary by Chemtrails Activist

Rep Kucinich Rewrites HR 2977 - ´Chemtrails´ Disappear

By Lorie Kramer
seektress@ev1.net
January 27, 2002


The "Space Preservation Act of 2001" originally introduced in the House by Rep. Dennis Kucinich as HR 2977 has been re-written.

The new, revised bill, HR 3616, "Space Preservation Act of 2002" was introduced January 23, 2002.

Re-writing bills is a common enough practice as a bill goes through the legislative process. However, the differences between HR 2977 and HR 3616 are more than just a few tweaks here or there.

By its conspicuous appearance in 2977, the term ´chemtrails´ received a form of credibiity within the official government process never seen before...producing the hope that one courageous Representative had finally had the fortitude to take the issue of chemtrails to a level of Congressional scrutiny long overdue.

Even though chemtrails are sprayed/deployed in the 2-6 mile high range,and not the 60 mile altitude stated in 2977, the simple fact of their inclusion in Kucinich´s 2977 list of weapons systems was deemed a major breakthrough by tens of thousands of citizens and researchers across the country who have been monitoring and investigating the spraying going on in the skies of America for the past three years.

In Rep. Kucinich´s revised new (some woud say ´emasculated´) Bill, HR 3616, there is no longer any mention whatever of:

* chemtrails,
* particle beams
* electromagnetic radiation
* plasmas
* extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation
* or mind-control technologies as weapons systems covered in the measure.


In fact, ´Exotic Weapons´ - as boldly-stated in HR 2977 - are not even mentioned in HR 3616. So, what happened here? Did someone have a ´friendly chat´ with Rep. Kucinich? Did the Congressman inhale a bit too much aluminum during his morning job? Did he look up one day and find himself standing under a big ´X´ and feel his knees get a little wobbly?

As stated in Kucinich´s first version of his "Space Preservation Act of 2001" -

"The term ´exotic weapons systems´ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space."

Apparently Rep. Kucinich is no longer concerned about the effects of the testing and use of exotic weapons systems on natural ecosystems and living organisms on the planet.

Although chemtrails are no longer stated as a weapons system, or even mentioned in HR3616, the question of the components of the RFMP /VTRPE warfare system is raised.

HR 3616 states -

"To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for
other purposes."

The intent of this passage remains fuzzy. Example: Are Imaging satellites used with the RFMP / VTRPE system broadly defined as part of a weapons system ?

HR 3616 further states -

"The terms ´space-based weapon´ and ´space-based system´ mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person by directing a source of energy against that object or person."

The word "directing" is clearly the key. Strictly speaking, the RFMP system does, by imaging, provide information to direct a source of energy against that particular object or person.

HR3616 also says -

"4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems."

They could say the RFMP is not a weapon - it does not "fire a bullet," but it is part of a weapons system. There are clearly serious issues of definition in Kucinich´s new Bill. It is conceivable that the RFMP /VTRPE weapons system may fall in the area covered by HR3616.

It remains a mystery as to how the word ´chemtrails´ appeared in HR 2977 to begin with. Investigation into that point is ongoing. Who actually is authoring the text of these bills? Why such an emphasis on "exotic weapons" in HR 2977 but then nothing mentioned about them in HR 3616?

My call to Rep. Kucinich´s Washington office last week was brief. I was told there had been "quite a few" calls regarding HR 2977. I was then told my questions should be directed to the person on the congressman´s staff who handled that bill. I was then transfered to that person and received...big surprise...their voice mail service. I left a message with my contact information. No reply has been received to date. I will place a follow-up call again this week. We suggest others do the same.

Even though the term ´chemtrails´ has been removed from the revised bill, efforts to continue to educate and alert others about the chemtrail issue go on. Many thanks to those who have taken the time to contact their Congressional Representatives, keep it up.

We still know what we see. We still didn´t consent. We still want it stopped.

Lorie Kramer
Chem Trail Tracking USA


This post has been edited by PuPP on Feb 5 2005, 10:55 PM




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Jan 24 2005, 09:25 PM
Quote Post
eyeball.gif eyeball.gif

IMHO, this is one of the most important threads in this section....





--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Intentions
**
Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 451
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 5 2005, 05:00 PM
Quote Post
New to the forum.........This had passed my attention and knowing about this makes my perusal of this site well worth it. thumbsup2.gif


They probably gutted it because it would have led to the exposure and further definition of the subject matter.............one of the reasons mind control is so effective is because an absurdly large percentage of people do not understand basic psychology, much less ways to influence and manipulate mood/opinion. Included in the initial bill was also a reference to mood management - a valuable concept that is controlled via percieved social pressure propogated by our communicative medias that can affect the motivation of an individual; and that is some of the more general aspects, as mood management is more specifcally directed via chemical inductives. But, we wouldn't want to describe subtle techniques better utilized with minimal awareness, now would we.

Too bad. My life would be made easier with increased awareness on this matter.




--------------------
Economics is what forces people into action or the lack thereof. Mind control is what makes people happy about it.
PMEmail Poster
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 5 2005, 10:52 PM
Quote Post
Hey SubVolitional, glad you got to see this post.

I studied child psychology in jr college but dropped the course as I did not like learning about mind manipulation, especially on children.

(I was a summer day camp counselor and gymnastics instructor at the time and actually thought the knowledge would be useful at first)

Freud pisses me off and I have no respect for anyone who tries to tell us how things are or how we should manipulate people to get them to do what we want.

Those beings are masters of mind manipulation and control.

Thousands of years of experience.




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Intentions
**
Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 451
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 6 2005, 12:28 AM
Quote Post
Originally posted by Pupps "Freud pisses me off and I have no respect for anyone who tries to tell us how things are or how we should manipulate people to get them to do what we want."



Awesome. Aside from the awareness Freud encouraged to "possible motivations", he is just about worthless.

To reference your above quote; How can anyone purporte to know how things are for anyone but their self. As to manipulating people, beyond imploring an open mind and objective reasoning, it is almost "criminal." Any reasonable mindset will discern the reality of life and the context of "morality."

Alas, that is not our reality. I support objectivity in every sense. Mind control is a valid point of research and will continue. To those who have never heard of it, it is immaterial, more or less, to my lamentation. Like I said, an open discussion and broader awareness would make my life easier..........At any rate.........thanks for the acknowledgement thumbsup2.gif

Edit: Pupp: your post on ATS instigated my involvement here; Coneheads; just thought you would appreciate the info..........




--------------------
Economics is what forces people into action or the lack thereof. Mind control is what makes people happy about it.
PMEmail Poster
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 6 2005, 12:51 AM
Quote Post
Hey SubVolitional, I'm glad you can relate to my opinion, which of course, is my right as well as yours and I agree, NO ONE should take that away by claiming they have all of the answers for what is good for your life or my life.

Suggestions or helpful advice is one thing, but when someone claims to have all of the answers and speaks as if they know it all, sends a BIG red flag up for me.

ATS, man, that site is run by the Gestapo. Some good stuff can be found there, but ONLY if you tow the party line.

Deny Ignorance = Attack the messenger.

I got pissed off when they closed the Carbon Breathers thread.

Someone else had posted my words from the Majestic Documents message board that I wrote in 2003 and I happened to find it while searching through google to see how google has my site indexed.

The thread sat there, untouched since 2003 as I had never seen it, and NOT one person posted on it.

I started posting on the thread, letting them know it was me who wrote it, immediately was jumped all over by their carbon breathing gestapo.

I then started posting images of liberated Iraqi children, you know, the ones liberated from their arms and legs.... and POOF - closed!

I'm glad you saw the skull images.... designed to open our minds and make us wonder that there may be others who do not look at all like us.

Doesn't mean they are bad or evil, same as the carbon breathers.

Time will tell!

"Ye Shall Know Them By Their Fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Intentions
**
Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 451
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 6 2005, 01:07 AM
Quote Post
Like I say, I am new to the site, so "time will tell."

I do support your opinions; individual is a defined word for a reason.

ATS, IMO, is relevant because of exposure and the emphasis on source. It is a site dedicated to alternative opinion and fact; only if it can be backed up. I'm still trying to figure out how to introduce logic arguements to oppose some misinterpretations(you're right......Deny Ignorance is a great thing to aspire to but do the majority of members "grok" the meaning of such a statement? IMO, no.

Not familiar with the carbon breathers; if I find it an interesting topic, I might u2u or private message you regarding(do not want to detract from the integrity of your thread......it is highly relevant. I appreciate the "more liberal," expression on this site; not enough "ignorance" to detract from rational consideration........I suppose I would thank you for this potential expression I have bugging my nerves..........

stormtrooper.gif (I really wanted to use this smiley but don't think I'llever find a reason to...... nyuknyuk.gif .....




--------------------
Economics is what forces people into action or the lack thereof. Mind control is what makes people happy about it.
PMEmail Poster
Top


Can you dig it?
******
Group: Members
Posts: 1149
Member No.: 210
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 6 2005, 04:11 AM
Quote Post
You may find http://www.aches-mc.org useful. reading2.gif


PMEmail Poster
Top


Freedom Fighter
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 745
Member No.: 237
Mood: 



  Posted: Feb 6 2005, 08:48 AM
Quote Post
This is the famous bill that includes the item “(ii) chemtrails;“ which in itself was an official recognition that such activity exists.

So chemtrails ought to be one of these things:

QUOTE
The term `exotic weapons systems´ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.


Pay attention that it says “damage ... climate, weather and tectonic systems” which is beyond manipulate. Like manipulating weather and such.


“to damage space or natural ecosystems” this is so inqualifiable...


The fact that the exotic stuff is no long on the substitute bill it is secondary. The cat is out of the bag and there’s no way to put back the tooth paste in the tube.

As to “mood management, or mind control” ... they don’t specifically say anything about tv, advertising, public opinion builders, social, moral and religious traditions, conventions and customs, accepted standards, normalization, and so on and so for...


It's just a bill... and no matter the way we want to look at it it will always be a tool of control...


Nobody can fight them to win through laws and enforcement and even less by direct opposition but we can by knowledge and awareness.


Hey Wahya !!

That is just a great website you point us to. Thanks!!

smileNew4.gif
Thessa




--------------------
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32 (NKJV)
PMEmail Poster
Top


Intentions
**
Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 451
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 6 2005, 05:44 PM
Quote Post
QUOTE
As to “mood management, or mind control” ... they don’t specifically say anything about


Exactly. There are many ways to influence amind, even if it is merely to incline an individual towards irrelevancy and consumerism. That is what powers the economy, allowing "progress" to continue and fat wallets to bulk up.

QUOTE
Nobody can fight them to win through laws and enforcement and even less by direct opposition but we can by knowledge and awareness.


Definetely agree with that.......:thumbs up2:


Thanks for the site, Wahya




--------------------
Economics is what forces people into action or the lack thereof. Mind control is what makes people happy about it.
PMEmail Poster
Top


Intentions
**
Group: Members
Posts: 47
Member No.: 451
Mood: 



Posted: Feb 18 2005, 09:49 AM
Quote Post
My introduction of this thread to another forum:




Legal Reference to Mind Control

Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2001 to the House of Representatives. Following is an excerpt from the original draft.........


QUOTE
:
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or


This passage was drawn as a legal definition for:

QUOTE
:
(1) The term `space´ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon´ and `weapons system´ mean a device capable of any of the following:


Notice that a congressman saw fit to acknowledge the potential for, "mood management and mind control." For a congressman to note the potential for an abuse is to recognise the existence of current methods, which are useful upon a population in a limited service as factors can help to vary the exposure or interpretation of the stimulii by any given person. The inclusion of this in an "outer space" reference implies the possibility for a much broader application of said techniques, also impling at least a rudimentary knowledge of EMG, ELF, and other effects that longe-range waves of intense frequencies can have on an individual.

Following are two links, one for the proposed bill with the references to mood management and mind control, the other for the passed proposal, which no longer contains said references.
First

Second


My take on this is that the omition of the mind control references in the accepted bill was to prevent a legal definition of mind control and subsequent legal identification and analysis of techniques as well as sciences supporting it. Also, the unquantifiable nature of any given persons mindset would have made such an attempt to define mind control a difficult one. That would have given rise to the speculation, based in curiosity not incredulity, on the many applications in our society for satellites and other longe-range wave inclusive technologies, such as HAARP.

Of course, one could attribute this to the paranoid mind of a congressman, but also notice the terms "psychotronic," and "information war." These are accepted and widely used tactics that are designed for the population, read propoganda. To influence the opinion and personality of an individual goes a long way to ensure a support base for your own operations/ideals. In tandem with propoganda, mood management would create an ideal combination for the application of the desired opinions/ideals, and this could be expanded to create a few prominent mindsets. "Divide and Conquer," as the population would be to busy with infighting(if a population can be viewed as an entity in the political-socio-economic forum) to effect any thing that is not supprted by existing information disseminations. But these are my own ruminations.........





--------------------
Economics is what forces people into action or the lack thereof. Mind control is what makes people happy about it.
PMEmail Poster
Top

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.6456 ]   [ 17 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."
~ James A. Garfield, President of the United States


MORE POLITICAL ART

"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
~ Amschel Mayer Rothschild