Latest Shouts In The Shoutbox -- View The Shoutbox
The shoutbox is currently offline!

[ Smilies | BBCodes ]

     
 
Click Here and visit PuPPs FREE StuFF

This website contains controversial information that may be disturbing to some viewers.
The theories, conclusions and commentaries are presented in an attempt to reveal the hidden truths.
It is up to the viewer to determine what they choose to believe after evaluating all available sources of information.

 
     

NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
Does your government represent your best interests?


     
 
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
~ Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.



POLITICAL ART GALLERY



IMPORTANT TOPICS

1. U.S. NEWS MEDIA CAN LEGALLY LIE TO YOU
There is no law preventing the U.S. news media from intentionally lying to the public. Whistle blowers and honest reporters are fired for telling the truth.

2. FLUORIDE IS A TOXIN/POISON
Read the Poison Warning label on your toothpaste, then call the 800# and ask;
"Why do you put poison in my toothpaste?"

3. NEW FLU VACCINE IS LOADED WITH MERCURY
by Dr. Joseph Mercola

4. PEDOPHILES IN HIGH PLACES
Also: Conspiracy of Silence Video

5. ASPARTAME IS HARMFUL
Equal, Nutra-Sweet and over 6000 food and beverage products contain Aspartame

6. On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 (2 Trillion) in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for.
Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the [9/11] attack on the World Trade Center and The Pentagon the following morning would assure that the story remained buried.


http://drinkingwaterlosangeles.com
Serving the greater Los Angeles area,
Los Angeles Drinking Water is proud to offer Reverse Osmosis filtration systems
that remove trace elements such as arsenic, mercury, lead and fluoride
which are known to be in Los Angeles tap water according to
the 2013 DWP Water Quality report.
POLITICAL ART GALLERY









"If our nation is ever taken over, it will be taken over from within."
~ James Madison, President of the United States

  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Texas George And The Last Crusade


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Mar 18 2004, 01:26 PM
Quote Post
Texas George And The Last Crusade

By Hsing Lee
lee8798@shaw.ca
3-15-4


In 1095 AD, Urban II, bishop of Rome, made a call for a Holy Crusade in order to take Jerusalem from Jews and Muslims in the name of Christianity. When they captured Jerusalem, they embarked on a merciless killing spree. They burned Jews alive within their Synagogues. They slaughtered Muslims. And to add insult to injury, they made their captive Muslims clean up all the blood and body parts that littered the streets.

Ninety-two years of decadence and savagery against Jews and Muslims followed, until Saladin and his Muslim armies sent the bastards packing on October 2, 1187, and freed the Holy Land from European occupation. Unlike the genocide of the Crusaders a hundred years earlier, there were no scenes of senseless slaughter after the European surrender. Saladin even allowed Richard to take home the relics from the Church of the Sepulchre.

In 1189, Pope Gregory VIII issued a Papal Bull that prompted the Third Crusade. The idea was to take back Jerusalem from Saladin's armies. During this Crusade, the man we know today as Richard the Lionhearted showed the true Lion's Heart of a Christian.

Over a failed negotiation, Richard ordered the slaughter of all his Muslim prisoners 2700 men, women, and children, in full view of Saladin's army.

The fact that we still refer to him as "the Lionhearted" today says a whole lot about Western values, doesn't it?

In any case, the Crusade was a failure. They never took Jerusalem.

The next great assembly of European Knights, Crusade number four, was in 1202. Again, their Crusade was a flop. They never even made it to Jerusalem, and only a handful made it as far as Syria.

By 1217, Pope Honorius III had forgotten about the shellacking the Church had taken in previous years in the Middle East, and wanted to go back for more. He wanted revenge. Honorius put Pelagius in charge of the Fifth Crusade. And Pelagius, greedy for land and power, ended up with neither.

At one point, the Muslims offered to surrender Jerusalem to the invaders along with a thirty-year truce, if only the Europeans would leave occupied Egypt. Pelagius refused, and laid siege to Damietta. They captured the city, but lost it to the Muslims two years later.

And they never took Jerusalem.

Ten years later, they were ready for more. The Sixth Crusade began in 1227. But this time, the Crusade was led by Emperor Fredrick instead of the Church. And Frederick just happened to be out of favor with the Church at the time. Pope Gregory had excommunicated him for falling sick at the start of the Crusade. Despite this, Frederick pressed on, and decided to try something original - diplomacy without the blood and genocide.

And guess what? He negotiated a deal which gave Christians control of Jerusalem from 1229 till 1244 when the Turks and Egyptians kicked them out.

In 1249, Louis IX embarked on the Seventh Crusade to try and win back Jerusalem. Again, the Muslims offered a deal which would have given Christians control of Jerusalem. Again, the greedy vicious Crusaders refused to make a deal, preferring genocide and slaughter to sitting down and talking things out. It was their downfall.

After capturing Damietta, they were ambushed on the way to Cairo. Two hundred and ninety Knights Templar, each the equivalent of a modern day Abrams Tank, entered Mansourah. Only five made it out. ALL the English knights were killed.

And they never made it to Jerusalem. On top of that, Louis IX, Queen Margaret and their newborn baby were taken hostage, and had to pay a King's Ransom AND give back Damietta in exchange for their lives.

It's funny how time seems to diminish the memories of our most colossal fuckups. By 1270, Louis IX was ready to try again. On the Eighth Crusade, Louis's army made it as far as Carthage before Bubonic plague put an end to 185 years of attempted genocide against Jews and Muslims by Europeans.

Looked at from an overhead perspective, one must conclude that these Christian Crusaders got their asses kicked good and proper. That's what happens when you have bad intentions for others, and think with your fists instead of your brain. You get out-thunk.

All of that blood, thunder, and wasted life.

For what?

Greed. Face value. Pride. The family name.

For the Church, a Pope who could call for a successful Crusade would be elevated in the historical pecking order. And he'd have a lot more political clout domestically.

For the Kings, Princes, Dukes and Barons, there was plunder. Elevated status within the military, and domestic props for helping the Church, which in the 12th century, also happened to be the largest "campaign financier" on the planet.

The Crusades were pure aristocratic politics. The same kind of politics George W Bush is engaged in today. And Bush has the same flair for bloodshed over diplomacy as Richard the Babykiller.

There's one more similarity between Bush and the Crusaders. Lying for posterity.

Here's an example of what liars the Bushlickers truly are. Cunning linguists every one. The text below is Donald the Lionhearted on TV this weekend.

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/face_031404.pdf

Donald Rumsfeld, CBS Face the Nation, March 14, 2004

SCHIEFFER: Well, let me just ask you this. If they did not have these weapons of mass destruction, though, granted all of that is true, why then did they pose an immediate threat to us, to this country?

Sec. RUMSFELD: Well, you're the--you and a few other critics are the only people I've heard use the phrase `immediate threat.' I didn't. The president didn't. And it's become kind of folklore that that's--that's what's happened. The president went...

SCHIEFFER: You're saying that nobody in the administration said that.

Sec. RUMSFELD: I--I can't speak for nobody--everybody in the administration and say nobody said that.

SCHIEFFER: Vice president didn't say that? The...

Sec. RUMSFELD: Not--if--if you have any citations, I'd like to see 'em.

The Center for American Progress has posted downloadable video of Rummy's statements on Face the Nation. Click on the link below to watch it.

www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7bE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D
6FF2E06E03%7d/RUMSFELDDENY4.WMV

Now, take a look at what Donald Rumsfeld said six months before the invasion of Iraq.

www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2002/s20020919-secdef2.html

Donald Rumsfeld, September 19, 2002 before the Senate Armed Services Committee

"There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction -- Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, just to name a few -- but no terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people than the regime of Saddam Hussein and Iraq"

"We do know that Saddam Hussein has been actively and persistently pursuing nuclear weapons for more than 20 years. But we should be just as concerned about the immediate threat from biological weapons. Iraq has these weapons"

Still not convinced that Donald Rumsfeld is a lying sack of shit?

Watch him say "immediate threat" for yourself on CSPAN's Realplayer feed. Click the link below then click on "Defense Sec. Donald Rumsfeld testifies on U.S. Policy in Iraq"

The first quote is just after the 21 minute mark. The second is just after the 31 minute mark. Listen for yourself. He who has ears, let him hear.

www.cspan.org/search/basic.asp?ResultStart=1&ResultCount=10&BasicQueryText=
Rumsfeld+testifies+Policy+Iraq&image1.x=0&image1.y=0&image1=Submit

How bout we cite you the middle finger salute, Mr. Rumsfeld?



BLOODLINES

By the 12th century, most of the European monarchies had married into Charlemagne's bloodline. It gave them legitimacy. Many of the prominent Crusaders had Charlemagne's blood in their veins. If one takes a look at Burke's Peerage, one will find that the same holds true for America's founding fathers, and in fact, for the majority of US Presidents.

www.burkes-peerage.net/sites/america/sitepages/page73-2.asp

"This web of interrelated presidents exists because in the early days of the republic most of the white male population which made up the electorate descended from a handful of well-documented 17th-century immigrants to New England or one of the other 13 colonies along the eastern seaboard. Indeed so small was the ruling class in the late 18th century that one can trace family links between George Washington and (1) Lord Cornwallis, his opponent at Yorktown, (2) both the men who came to dominate Europe militarily in the decade and a half after Washington's death - Napoleon and the Duke of Wellington, (3) Presidents Madison, Monroe, Van Buren and Taylor and beyond them Jefferson, Tyler, William H. and Benjamin Harrison, through the last two of whom one can reach Presidents Jackson and Polk."

The ruling class in Europe and North America share a common history, and a common ancestry. Many of these individuals take great pride in their stock. They see great esteem to be had in "one-upping" their predecessors by achieving things which their fathers or forefathers could not.

Just look at Bush Jr. clumsily trying to do what his father stopped short of doing in Iraq in 1991.

These people take family history very seriously. To the point where they lie about their achievements in their biographies, as both Bush 41 and 43 have done so liberally.

Symbols are also very important to these people. The Crucifix. Family Crests. Flags. A picture of George Bush in a flight suit. The soon to be launched aircraft carrier, the George H W Bush. They want to leave a lasting impression on history, one which portrays them in a powerful, grandiose light.

They have history, and long memories. Long enough to launch wars of vendetta for a century or three in the name of family pride errr in the name of the Church, and the "security" of Europe, of course. Yeah, that's it. Security.

Right about now, you're probably thinking, "ok, what's the point of all this history? What's he getting at, because I'm getting bored of this"

Well, the point is this: when these people build a symbol, they don't do it haphazardly. They do it with an intended purpose, knowing full well the meaning behind the symbolism. A flag with 13 stars, for the 13 states, each a constellation within a greater Union. A dollar bill that says, "An Undertaking Favored by God - New World Order".

Well, ok. It's in latin. Annuit Coeptis. Novus Ordo Seclorum. But you get the point.

On September 11, 1990, George H W Bush made his "Toward a New World Order" speech. January 16, 1991, he launches his war in the Middle East. Twelve years later, thanks to a US and UK enforced sanctions regime, nearly two million Iraqis are dead, half of them children under the age of five.

It is a war crime that puts the First Crusade to shame.

Keep in mind, this is a family whose political speeches are rife with Biblical phrase. A family whose bread and butter is the vote of the Christian Coalition. George W Bush even credits the Billy Graham CRUSADE for his Christian rebirth.

Surreal, isn't it?

How did America get here?

After the American Revolution, despite the protests of George Washington, a group of American aristocrats founded the Washington National Monument Society to build a monument to the original G Dubya. They hired a Freemason named Robert Mills as the architect.

Construction on the Washington Monument began in 1848, and was completed in 1884. We've all seen pictures of video of it. It's that giant white Egyptian Obelisk inside a circle that stands at one end of a huge lake. You can see some pictures of it by using the link below.

www.slizik.com/usa/DC/page_02.htm

As an aside, the man who designed the street layout of Washington DC, Pierre Charles L'Enfante, was also a Freemason. There are occult symbols all over Washington DC. Take a look at a road map some time.

The first question that comes to mind when one looks at the Dollar Bill and the Washington Monument is, "If the USA was meant to be a Christian nation as the Christian Coalition claims, then what's with the pagan idolatry on the dollar bill and in Washington DC?"

Clearly, these symbols have a purpose. They're meant as a symbol of something, and meant to send SOME kind of message. I don't think anyone can disagree with that.

But what message?

For that answer, we must travel to Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Islam.



ISLAM AND THE HAJJ PILGRIMAGE

Part of being a Muslim involves a pilgrimage to Mecca, to participate in the Hajj rituals. Every Muslim who is able to do so is expected to make the pilgrimage at least once in their lifetime. The pilgrimage involves fasting, cleansing of one's body and spirit, and following in the footsteps of the Prophet Mohammed.

It's believed that doing this will bring the faithful closer to their Prophet. And for most, it has precisely this effect. It is an awesome experience for the faithful, millions of whom make the trip each year. It's gotten so busy these days that every year, people get trampled or asphyxiated by the mesmerized sea of humanity.

Most of us know of the press to circle the Kaaba stone seven times. Muslims in Mecca circle the stone, touch it, and then work their way back out of the press of bodies. Take a look at the sea of humanity we're talking about by clicking the link below.

www.themodernreligion.com/basic/mosque/pic.html

Another lesser known part of the Hajj pilgrimage involves throwing stones at Satan. The pilgrims collect 49 or 70 stones. They're supposed to throw seven stones at each of three "pillars" to cast out Satan.

So they collect their stones, and go to a place called Mina where the "pillars" stand. Mina is supposedly where Abraham, on his way to sacrifice his only begotten son as per God's command, met Satan on the road. But rather than be taken in by Satan, Abraham threw seven stones at Satan, as per the Archangel Gabriel's advice, and in doing so cast out Satan.

Throwing stones at Mina is meant to symbolize one's own battle with Satan. It's a form of spiritual cleansing. You can see a partial view of one of the pillars at Mina by clicking the link below, which takes you to an MSNBC story about the Hajj.

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4087722/

Note how closely the MSNBC image is cropped. They don't give you a wide shot of the pillar. But don't worry, the international media outside the USA will show you what the American ruling class hides from the people.

Take a look at the pictures of the "pillars" at Mina by clicking on the link below.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp...w/69191/1/.html

The highest act of devotion in the Muslim faith, the Hajj, involves throwing stones at Satan, symbolized by an EGYPTIAN OBELISK INSIDE A CIRCLE.

It's the fucking Washington Monument.

Perhaps now you understand a little more clearly why it's so easy for many Muslims to accept that the United States of America is "the Great Satan".

A symbol is a powerful thing. And the symbol of the American Revolution, to Muslims, is literally a manifestation of the Serpent of Eden. The Devil. Shaitan. The Great Satan.

And the guys who built the Washington Monument chose this symbol ON PURPOSE.

Are any of us truly so naïve as to think that the direct descendants of the original Crusaders, men whose arch-enemy has always been Jews and Muslims, didn't realize what they were doing when the chose this symbol to be the Washington Monument?

There's a point here that I want to make clearly. There are a great many retards out there like Graham Jukes who want to blame what white guys are doing and have done on Judaism and Jews. Well, the Washington Monument wasn't chosen as a symbol and erected by Jews. It was a choice made by white guys. White men chose these symbols: the obelisk, the eye of Ra, the pyramid.

They are symbols of Egyptian monarchy that Jews ran away from, and that Muslims despise. Symbols that are anathema to BOTH groups of Semites. America's symbols declare it to be diametrically opposed to the Semitic peoples.

Zionism in America has ten times as many Christian supporters as Jewish ones. And what is Zionism, if not the colonialism of Palestine by the descendants of European Crusaders?

The largest Christian group in America supports Zionism, and they're not Jewish. The majority of its Jewish supporters are themselves white Europeans, with no Semitic blood. They're Russian Ashkenazis for the most part. White people who converted to Judaism in the 9th century.

In fact, most of the Jews settled in Gaza and the West Bank, 2/3 of whom hold US Citizenship, are the descendants of white people, and are not descended from Shem.

But despite these facts, the retards insists there's a "Jewish" conspiracy going on. Never mind that the vast majority of profit in Iraq and on arms sales to Israel is being made by white Christians. Never mind that the economic woes in America have been brought on by Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush: four white Christians. Never mind that every shooting war America has entered into since Korea has been about profits for white people.

In the eyes of the retards, "Jews" are to blame. Blame a religion, and not the European gene pool, even if there are ten times as many supporters of the Ideology who are Christian. Blame the religion, even though the religion itself calls for a Jewish Diaspora. Blame the religion, even though Zionism is a 19th century creation which came three thousand years after Judaism, and has been in the control of White Christians since the early 20th century. Blame the religion, even though Christianity has been responsible for hundreds of millions more murders than Judaism. Blame Jews, even though belief in Zionism and belief in Judaism have nothing to do with one another.

I've seen this story before. Germany, 1933. Those opposed to Hitler were "in league" with the Jews.

I guess it's easier for the retards to blame others than to accept responsibility within their own social demographic. For them, DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt.

One last point on this issue. Many people insist that I'm wrong about Ashkenazis being Caucasian. Many insist that they are, in fact, Semitic/Negroid in origin.


Well, if that's so, then how come the Aryan Brotherhood accepts Ashkenazis in their ranks? Anyone who's spent time in an American prison can tell you that this is so.

The AB accepts Ashkenazi Jews because the Ashkenazis are WHITE GUYS. Caucasian Europeans. Plain, simple, historical fact.



CONCLUSIONS

The whole purpose of the Crusades was the European conquest and rule of Palestine. Jerusalem in particular. And what European Aristocracy could not achieve by force nine hundred years ago, they have now achieved by way of military might and deception.

Sure, it was the Brits that began the Mandate of Palestine on September 11, 1922. But it was an American, Harry Truman, that forced UN Resolution 181 through the United Nations, creating the state of Israel. It's American military and "humanitarian" aid to Israel that fuels the occupation. It's American settlers from Brooklyn that occupy most of Gaza and the West Bank. It's American Veto power at the UN that ensures the occupation continues, and the settlements expand.

America's aristocracy is simply trying to accomplish what European aristocracy could not, for profit, for posterity, and in order to divide and conquer the Semitic people.

It's important to note, to the point of belaboring the point, that the vast majority of the Jewish settlers in Palestine are of Russian Ashkenazi, and not Semitic, descent. They're the descendants of Caucasian/European converts to Judaism, and not indigenous people to the land of Canaan. Think of them as "Stealth Crusaders". And these Settlers, who now cry "anti-Semitism" when one criticizes them, even though they're not Semitic, have managed to bring Jerusalem back under European control.

Well, half of Jerusalem anyway.

If the Christian Coalition and Jewish Extremists have their way, we're in the final days of the Last Crusade. Each is using the other to try and bring on the apocalypse according to their own ideology. The Christians are expecting the Second Coming of Christ, and the Jews are awaiting the Coming of the Messiah.

When the Messiah comes, he's supposed to save all the Jews in one fell swoop, and wipe out all their enemies, ushering in a Utopian era for the Jewish people. But before the Messiah can come, Jews have to rebuild the Temple of Solomon at the Temple Mount - the place Muslims call Al-Aqsa, or the Dome of the Rock.

Sounds simple, right? Go build the thing, and you're one step closer to the Messiah come to earth. Well, not so fast. First, a kosher Red Heifer must be born, then sacrificed. Then the Jews must use the ashes of the heifer to purify themselves so they can enter the holy ground at the Temple Mount without bring a nasty curse down upon themselves.

Rather than wait for a very rare Red Heifer to be born naturally, the crazies in Israel and America, white Christians and white Jews working together, have been trying to genetically manufacture a kosher Red Heifer. For real. They already birthed one, but it failed to pass the tests, so they're still trying.

Consider that if the Jews are right, the Messiah will wipe out all the Muslims and Christians and save only the Jews. So why on earth would the Christian Coalition help these Jewish extremists to do this?

Because in the Christian version of the apocalypse, the Jews rebuilding the Temple of Solomon has to happen before the Second Coming of Christ, in which Jesus will kill all the Muslims and Jews who won't convert to Christianity, and save all the Christians.

This is why Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson are supporters of Israel. They want to bring about the forcible conversion of Jews to Christianity by divine power, or see them all dead if they won't convert. Well, ok, supporting Israel helps their Defense Stock portfolios too. But seriously, they have tens of millions of people believing this stuff, as ridiculous as it sounds.

On the Muslim side of things, Ayatollah Khomeini is considered a Prophet by Shiites. Osama Bin Laden is trying to create conditions in which he could be seen as the Mahdi: a harbinger of the Muslim version of the Apocalypse.

Personally, I think the 5.9 billion of us who don't subscribe to any of this rubbish need to get smart, and turn the guns on ALL the monotheistic idiots who are running this dog and pony show, before they start a nuclear war over Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa.

What's funny is that all three groups overlook some simple facts.

The pillars at Mina weren't made by God. They were made by men. Same goes for the Washington Monument, and the Temple Mount. There's nothing divine about any of them. They're just stupid pieces of rock carved by Masons, paid for by the ruling classes who wanted a symbol to unify their people so they could make war on the other guys.

Same goes for the books. Not a one was written by a god. All of them were written and edited by human beings, Prophet status notwithstanding.

Belief is a dangerous thing. Blind faith in the most ludicrous stories written by people ignorant of evolution, physics, and basic scientific principal is even more dangerous.

Giving a nuclear panic button to a guy who represents 30 million of these idiots is the stupidest thing and most dangerous thing any group of people have done since the beginning of recorded history. Especially when that individual is a pathological liar with a shockingly low IQ.

I mean come on, think about this for a minute. The President of the United States is the most powerful leader on the planet. He holds at his fingertips the power to end all human life on earth within an hour.

Given that a POTUS has this type of power, shouldn't the fact that an individual is capable of believing a silly story at face value without any concrete proof automatically DISQUALIFY that person from holding high office?

A guy like that might even end up believing that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

Thanks to the Bush family, we're living in a freakin' movie. Texas George and the Last Crusade. A movie where an Empire falls into bankruptcy, and the entire world goes to war to avoid being crushed by George Bush's Crusade.

He flat out called his war a Crusade on September 19, 2001, for those of you who don't remember. After all, he wants his place in history as a Holy Crusader.

Of the three factions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, ONLY the Muslims have their Nuclear weapons out of the hands of religious extremists. General Pervez Musharraf staged a military coup to get those nukes AWAY from people with ideological views that mirror those of the Christian Coalition and Israel's National Religious Party.

And yet we say it's dangerous to allow Muslims to get nuclear weapons. Please. They're the only ones who are safeguarding their weapons from Religious fundamentalists.

Ariel Sharon's coalition government would not have a majority without the Jewish extremists, which puts them in the driver's seat. George Bush would not be in the White House without the support of his Christian Extremist voting base. They are the two most dangerous men on earth, and the greatest danger to human life this planet has ever known, because both electoral bases are Hell-bent on kicking off Armageddon for religious reasons.

I really do think that some level headed Generals in Israel and the USA should be looking at General Musharraf right now. They need to borrow a few pages from his playbook, and get those weapons OUT OF THE HANDS OF RELIGIOUS FANATICS and those who do their bidding.

It was a lot less complicated when the biggest weapon man possessed was a catapult. Today, the actions of these religious idiots, descendants of the rock-tossers, affect the entire planet. It's not just a game anymore. There are serious consequences to nuclear war, and nuclear war is precisely what we'll get with Bush and Sharon in power.

But it's not too late to abort this Crusade. If a different man is in the White House in January 2005, there's a glimmer of hope. If the Gaza pullout drives a rift between Sharon and the looney tunes crowd, there's even more hope.

If Bush can be defeated in Iraq, bogged down and harassed to the breaking point so he don't have the resources to expand his war for oil and reconstruction contracts under the pretext of faith, America's might can be broken like the Soviet Union was smashed fighting the immovable Mujeheddin in Afghanistan.

Debt fueled spending for war is Bush's Achilles heel. The cost to benefit ratio will not allow him to fight prolonged wars AND maintain several occupations at once. It costs millions of dollars for each confirmed kill. Conversely, each kill only costs the Iraqis or the Taliban a few bucks in bathtub chemicals.

Our course is not predetermined. Nothing is writ in stone. It's up to WE, THE PEOPLE, to decide the future. Look at what the Spaniards did yesterday. They acknowledged that Bush, Blair and Aznar lied, and that there was no cause for war in Iraq other than ego and profit. They turned out in record numbers to vote against the government, and elected people who promised to get the Spanish army out of Iraq by June 30.

www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/75521/1/.html

No more Crusades for the Conquistadors. They've learned their lesson.

Have we?

Are we going to continue to allow ourselves to be manipulated by political aristocrats who wrap themselves in the Church and the flag while they profiteer from our stupidity, or are we going to wake up and DO SOMETHING?

Last Crusade, or the beginning of an era of peace, and true international co-operation?

That choice is up to you, on the second Tuesday in November.

Peace


Comment
Alton Raines
3-17-4

I have to correct Mr. Lee on one point -- Christian prophecy does not teach that Jesus Christ will return in the Second Coming to "kill all the Muslims and Jews who won't convert to Christianity, and save all the Christians." Most Christians do not view the Second Coming this way, either. It was Jesus himself who said, while prophesying of the last days and his Second Coming, that "were those days not cut short, no flesh would be left alive; but for the sake of the elect those days have been cut short." The Second Coming has two purposes, neither of which involve the wholesale slaughter of Jews or Muslims by Christ. The first is to put an end to all human struggle and usher in everlasting peace and justice. The second is to obliterate the human war machine forever. Hsing Lee, like many, has confused Armageddon with the Second Coming. Armageddon is a very specific battle that never actually takes place because the returning Lord Jesus puts an end to it (and puts an end to the Man of Sin who leads the world into it). This is an act of infinite mercy. He will, at his coming, destroy all the armies of the world which will be gathered together at the place called Megiddo (hence the name, Armageddon). Everyone else on earth is spared. Christ puts an end to the end of the world, he doesn't bring the end of the world! He will then judge the nations... all people. He will dispense perfect justice. As for Jesus returning to kill Jews, nothing could be further from the truth.

The prophet Zechariah (chp 12-14) tells us that the Lord will cut off (kill) 2/3 that are in the land of Israel (this is happens by way of war breaking out in the region, for the land will be filled with violence and the nation will be mislead by a great false prophet), but that 1/3 will be spared, as a special remnant of the Jewish people, and safely brought through the conflict by the Lord, and established in great honor forever in the Kingdom of God. The prophets tell us in that day they will see him, see his wounds and mourn as for an only son, and their hearts will be turned to him. Not that he will destroy them all. As for the Muslims, the prophets tells us that the Jew and Arab, who are brothers, will embrace one another in complete harmony and brotherhood forever after. There's nothing about killing off "non-converts." The issue of "conversion" becomes rather moot once the Lord has appeared, coming upon clouds of glory with angels, indeed rescuing earth from demise at the hands of Satanic government which at that time will have reached total power. It will be obliterated in a moment of time. I think these twisted views of what Christians believe come not from people like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, but those who are clearly anti-christ like Hsing Lee, who do not understand and do not care to understand Christianity or Christians in their hatred for all things religious or spiritual.

As Hsing says, "Personally, I think the 5.9 billion of us who don't subscribe to any of this rubbish need to get smart, and turn the guns on ALL the monotheistic idiots who are running this dog and pony show, before they start a nuclear war over Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa." Ah, Yes, all the world's ills are due to monotheism and people of faith, and someone would just have the guts to kill us all off, the world would be a better place.

That is precisely the teaching of the anti-christ to come.


Comment
Kris Kahnert
3-17-4
Dear Mr. Lee:

I just read your latest posting on www.rense.com on Texas George and the Last Crusade. There was one thing that you left out. Not only is the Masonic religion straight out of the bowels of Pharonic Egypt (where the official religion was state mandated Satanism) but what we currently know of as Judaism is too. Modern day Judaism is what Jesus referred to as The Tradition of the Elders, an oral Torah that according to the Rabbi's man made religion is supposedly superior to the written one. Jesus condemned this oral traditon and the people who spread it in the strongest possible terms. This oral tradition had its beginning in Egypt. The Kabballa, a mixture of blasphemy and black magic which is also central to the modern day Jewish faith is from this same ancient Egyptian source.

See Michael Hoffman's web site at www.revionisthistory.org for more on this.

One good point you made is that the modern day Jews would not have even a small fraction of the power they do if it was not for the Christian Zionists that support them. Christian Zionists or Judeo-Christians are a contradiction of terms, a pairing of the opposites straight from the bowels of Hell.

Kris Kahnert


A Post Script To Texas George

From Hsing Lee
lee8798@shaw.ca
3-18-4

Well, I certainly seem to have stirred up a Hornet's nest.

80% of you are cheering me on, and 10% want me silenced or in Camp X-Ray.

Many of you who've written me have complained about Jeff Rense posting Alton Raines comments about my article, saying Jeff should never have posted such a silly comment at the bottom of my post.

Before moving on to the other stuff on my plate, I want to address this.

Thanks for standing up for me guys, but I don't believe in Censorship of any kind.

I send my stuff to Jeff for a reason. I send stuff to him because Jeff allows ALL sides to be heard on any given issue. It would be wrong of him NOT to have posted negative feedback, especially negative feedback which was as well crafted as the comments left by Alton Raines.


And ultimately, Raines WAS right, and I was wrong regarding the specificity of End Times Prophecy.

Unlike Mr. Bush and Rumsfeld however, I can say I was wrong, and stand corrected.

I DID screw the pooch. In my rush to write the rant, and with my bad habit of not proof reading what I write unless it exceeds 20 pages, I DID mix up my end times prophecies.

So get off Mr. Raines, and Jeff's back, ok?

The man had a point, and he made it. Kudos to Alton Raines.

And kudos to Jeff Rense and James Neff for allowing BOTH sides to make their case.

Wrong is wrong, people. Even when they guy whose facts are wrong is someone you like. And in this case, I was in factual error. I COULD have mocked monotheism without making this error, had I been more careful. And for that, I'm sorry.

You should also note that Mr. Raines did NOT take issue with anything else, except for my own rant about turning guns on the 100 million idiots, Christian, Jew and Muslim alike, who are fighting this Holy War against the other side, and have us all caught in the middle.

And he makes a valid point. To actually do what I suggested would just be another form of Totalitarianism. To say it makes me the anti-Christ, well, that's his opinion. And he's entitled to it. And I'll fight for his right to keep that opinion of me, and to speak it from the highest mountaintop.

And I APPLAUD Jeff for having the balls to post BOTH my rant, and Mr. Raines comments. This is what free speech is all about. Some of you haven't figured that out yet.

As Kim Campbell said on Bill Maher the other night, "If you don't see something in your community that offends you, you're not living in a free society."

It's not about being right. It's not about making the other side look stupid. It's about having an open forum for debate, where the KKK can call me Chink, I can call them Cracker, the Christians can call me anti-Christ, and I can call Colin Powell a House Nego, without anyone having to answer to the thought police.

When we lose that right to free speech, and the "Left" is MORE guilty here than the "Right" in terms of stifling controversial political speech, THAT is when we're screwed.

This is about each of us having an opinion, and a place to speak that opinion. I would not be sending my stuff to Jeff if he wasn't acting as a guardian of free speech. And I'm confident that so long as the law permits, Jeff Rense's site will be one of the few places on the internet where we can ALL be heard.

So please, while I appreciate the support, there's no need to go after Mr. Raines for calling me the anti-Christ. He's entitled to his opinion, and considering the way I treated monotheists in my rant, he had every right to use the language he did. In fact, had it been me on the receiving end of my rant, my language would have been far stronger, and more colorful, than Mr. Raines.

Stifling opinions and free speech is wrong, no matter what that speech is. And while I stand by my belief that holding belief in something which cannot be proven should disqualify someone from holding public office, that doesn't mean I want to silence these people. They have as much right to beef as I do, as loudly as they want.

That said, I want to move on to the other paragraph people seemed to take issue with:

"Personally, I think the 5.9 billion of us who don't subscribe to any of this rubbish need to get smart, and turn the guns on ALL the monotheistic idiots who are running this dog and pony show, before they start a nuclear war over Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa."

From a couple of emails I received, I realize I should have expounded on this a little. Fair enough. It DOES sound kind of harsh.

For the obtuse who don't understand what's implied in the above statement, what I'm saying here is this: there are six billion people on this planet. 5.9 billion of us are being held hostage by 30 million Christian Coalition retards, 2-3 million insane Jewish extremists, and 50-60 million Wahabbi and Shiite whack jobs who are ALREADY involved in a shooting war with one another, while the rest of us are caught in the middle.

And because they're already at war, guns in hand, figuratively speaking, I feel those guns should be turned around on those doing the fighting. Those of us who want no part in their Crusades need to find out voice, and get these nutballs out of positions of power, and take their WMD away from them.

I'm also speaking in self defense. Pat Robertson, in a dehumanizing, Hitler-like statement, has called for a "Holy Fumigation" of those who don't think like him and his flock. Osama has more or less done the same. So has Effi Eitam, head of the National Religious Party. Observe Mr. Robertson's statement for yourself:

"It is interesting, that termites don't build things, and the great builders of our nation almost to a man have been Christians, because Christians have the desire to build something. He is motivated by love of man and God, so he builds. The people who have come into (our) institutions (today) are primarily termites. They are into destroying institutions that have been built by Christians, whether it is universities, governments, our own traditions, that we have.... The termites are in charge now, and that is not the way it ought to be, and the time has arrived for a godly fumigation."
- Pat Robertson, New York Magazine, August 18, 1986

So this blowhard jerkoff who has his own TV station can call for me and all non-Christians to be fumigated and exterminated like insects, but it's not ok for me to want to save myself from his genocide by wanting to fight back?

What kind of hypocritical bullshit is that?

And take a look at Billy Graham's hypocrisy, from the Nixon Tapes:

Billy Graham: "...the country is caught in a stranglehold of Jews in the news and entertainment business. This stranglehold's got to be broken or the country's going down the drain,"

NIXON: "You believe that?"

Billy Graham: "Yes sir "

NIXON: "Oh boy," replied an elated Nixon, "So do I. I can't ever say that, but I believe it."

Billy Graham: "No, but if you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something."

Billy Graham: "a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine. They swarm around me and are friendly to me. Because they know I am friendly to Israel and so forth. They don't know how I really feel about what they're doing to this country."

And let's not even get into Jerry Falwell. A man who made his career by fighting against equal rights for black people, and against equal rights for women. Take a look at these quotes from the Three Stooges: Osama, Jerry, and Pat.

It appears that America's anti-Biblical feminist movement is at last dying, thank God, and is possibly being replaced by a Christ-centered men's movement which may become the foundation for a desperately needed national spiritual awakening.
-- Jerry Falwell

Your nation exploits women like consumer products or advertising tools, calling upon customers to purchase them. You use women to serve passengers, visitors and strangers to increase your profit margins. You plaster your naked daughters across billboards in order to sell a product without any shame. You have brainwashed your daughters into believing they are liberated by wearing revealing clothes, yet in reality all they have liberated is your sexual desire. After all this you say that you are the nation that supports women's freedom. - Osama Bin Laden, 2002

"There will never be world peace until God's house and God's people are given their rightful place of leadership at the top of the world. How can there be peace when drunkards, drug dealers, communists, atheists, New Age worshipers of Satan, secular humanists, oppressive dictators, greedy moneychangers, revolutionary assassins, adulterers, and homosexuals are on top?"
- Pat Robertson, The New World Order, p. 227, Word Publishing, 1991

·Your nation encourages drinking alcohol in all its shapes and forms i.e. production, trading and usage. On the one hand, you have made selling and using some drugs illegal, yet you so often turn a blind eye to this vice. Is it any surprise that your country has the largest drug addiction problem? - Osama Bin Laden, 2002

Bill Clinton created an epidemic of oral sex in our nation's High Schools - Jerry Falwell

Who can forget your previous President's immoral acts committed in the Oval office? After that you did not even bother putting him on trial and instead allowed him to wriggle himself out of the situation without reprimanding him in any way. History will remember you for all of this. - Osama Bin Laden, 2002

Peas in a fucking pod, the lot of them.

And sorry, but I have every right to want to fight back against such bollocks. If they have the right to express an opinion saying they want me exterminated, I have just as much right to say the same about them.

It's only hate speech when it's not true, and is unprovoked.

We're living in difficult times. Of that, there's no doubt. But stifling free speech and open dialogue, whether that speech is mine, Alton Raine's, Osama's, or Jerry Falwell's, is just plain WRONG.

One last point. Mr. Raines calls me the anti-Christ. Well, that's his opinion. For my part, I follow the teachings of Jesus as found in his own language, from his own time, in the Gospel of Thomas and the other Nag Hammadi transcripts. So go ahead and call me the anti-Christ if you want. I know it's not true, so he can say what he likes. It really doesn't matter to me. I'd be more upset if people WEREN'T getting defensive and lashing out to defend their beliefs, because that would mean fear is winning over free speech.

And we must NEVER allow that to happen. So slime away guys, I'm a big boy. And I have no business dishin' it if I can't take it in return. Fair's fair.

So thank you, Jeff, for having the courage and the moral character to post what I write, and to post what others write about me. Especially when I make an error, and the person with an opposing view points out that error. Lying is wrong, and by speaking incorrectly, what I said about the End Times Prophecies amounts to a lie.

And we should never tolerate lies.

TRUTH, above all else, should be God.

Peace






--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: May 25 2006, 05:48 PM
Quote Post
Does history repeat?

And is religion a most powerful control system?

In 1938, Adolf Hitler was Time Magazines Man of the Year

In 2004, George W. Bush was Time Magazines Person of the Year.

QUOTE
"God told me to strike at al-Qaida and I struck them, and then He instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me, I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them."
~ G.W. Bush


QUOTE
The Messianic Presidency
The Great Decider as God's Prophet
By TOM TURNIPSEED
QUOTE
Many disastrous conflicts in human history were led by men who spoke as if they were directed by God to lead the slaughter.

President Bush asserts that "I trust God speaks through me and without that, I couldn't do my job." His sincere belief that the human carnage and destruction resulting from his war of choice against Iraq is somehow the will of God should not be a surprise to Americans of the Christian and Jewish traditions.

As a seven year old child in a Christian church in Alabama, I was appalled by the Old Testament's story of Joshua and the battle of Jericho in our Sunday School class.

Joshua, a great prophet of God and successor to Moses as the leader of the Israelites was commanded by God to commit genocide in the 6th chapter of Joshua.

When invading Jericho, as instructed by God, the Jews "annihilated with the sword everything that breathed in the city, including men and women, young and old, as well cattle, sheep, and donkeys."

Then God commanded the Jews take the "silver and gold, bronze and iron" for "God's treasury".

When I asked the teacher why God would want his people to kill little children when Jesus loved the little children and was the Prince of Peace, our Sunday School teacher said the lesson was to obey God.

The Christian tradition of God as the warrior began in A.D. 312 with the Roman Emperor Constantine. Constantine said he had prayed for divine help before the engagement and then had a vision of a cross in the sky above his soldiers as they marched into the fray. This mystical event led to his Christian conversion after a major victory in battle against legions of his brother-in-law.

Christianity was declared the religion of the Roman Empire by Constantine, and the image of Christ as the Prince of Peace became conveniently interchangeable with Christ as the warrior God. Previously, the Roman Empire had persecuted the Christians because they were pacifists, taught not to serve in the military or use violence against others.

It had been unlawful for a Christian to be a soldier in the Roman army, but Constantine's conversion abruptly allied Christianity with Rome's military and by A.D. 416 it was compulsory for all Roman soldiers to be Christians. The medieval crusades led by Christians continued the genocide in the name of religion and recent history continues the tradition.

Before he became the Chancellor of Germany Hitler said, "My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter ", and as he launched WW II that devastated Europe Hitler said "I would like to thank Providence and the Almighty for choosing me of all people to be allowed to wage this battle for Germany."

In 1940, Adolf Hitler said, "But there is something else I believe, and that is that there is a God. . . . And this God again has blessed our efforts.."

In another speech to the German people Hitler said , " The mercy of the Lord slowly returns to us again. And in this hour we sink to our knees and beseech our almighty God that he may bless us, that He may give us the strength to carry on the struggle for the freedom, the future, the honor, and the peace of our people. So help us God."

Before he began his candidacy for President, George W. Bush told Evangelist James Robinson, "I feel like God wants me to run for President. I can't explain it, but I sense my country is going to need me. Something is going to happen . . . I know it won't be easy on me or my family, but God wants me to do it."

Bush has been called "a prophet" by Pat Robertson. According to Ralph Reed, God picked the President because "he knew George Bush had the ability to lead in this compelling way."

Bush has said, "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job". Bob Woodward, a Washington Post editor asked President Bush if he consulted with his father, the 41st President about Iraq before invading Iraq and his reply was "He is the wrong father to appeal to in terms of strength; there is a higher father that I appeal to."

The BBC reported that Palestinian Foreign Minister Nabil Shaath described his first meeting with President Bush in June 2003. Shaath says: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, "George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan." And I did, and then God would tell me, "George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq " And I did. And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, "Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East." And by God I'm gonna do it.'"

Some White House aides have described Bush's behavior as arrogant and abusive, characterized by sanctimonious invocations of his personal relationship with Jesus Christ combined with obscenity-laced invectives against subordinates.

It is very interesting that Bush's self-perception as being a spokesperson for God is history repeating itself when compared to other leaders who have wrought so much war and destruction. Should people of religious faith be comforted to know we have a Presidential Prophet of God in the White House?

A self-described decider of what is best for our country? Is it God who is really directing Bush's policies of aggressive war, torture, domestic spying and the unprecedented transfer of social wealth from the country's working class majority to the multi-millionaires and billionaires that make up its financial elite?

Tom Turnipseed is an attorney, writer and political activist in Columbia, South Carolina. He can be reached at his website:
http://www.turnipseed.net

http://www.counterpunch.org/turnipseed05152006.html




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Jun 6 2006, 10:37 AM
Quote Post
Here's a related article...


user posted image

QUOTE
Chosen By God To Lead America"
Posted September 24, 2002
By Rick Friedman & Stewart Nusbaumer.
QUOTE
Having received the green light from “above,” Christian George is about to unleash a holiness that just might Armageddon all of us.

All of us know that Osama bin Laden is a Muslim religious fanatic hell-bent on implementing his demented version of Armageddon in the Middle East. What we’re not sure about, however, is whether or not George Bush is a Christian religious fanatic hell-bent on his demented version of Armageddon in the Middle East. It’s this scary thought planted in the air of public consciousness that our timid mainstream media has begun to explore, lightly explore, delicately dancing around the edges to avoid setting off the land mine of religion.

Two weeks ago in the Christian Science Monitor, Francine Kiefer wrote that "Bush’s religious beliefs are emerging as a central influence to his policies and politics -- inextricably linked to everything from the war on terrorism to the November elections.” “For Bush,” Kiefer continued, “who reads his Bible every morning, faith extends beyond the national catharsis of the moment. By his own admission, his religious views shape much of who he is and, by extension, experts say, some of his most important decision-making."

Just over a week ago, Time published an article by Michael Duffy, who had interviewed more than a dozen senior Republican Party operatives, people who advise and support the president and talk regularly to him and his inner circle. "Bush has always preferred his poison straight up or down, good vs. bad, dead or alive, you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists,” Duffy wrote. "In one horrifying two-hour period [on September 11], the world shuddered and conformed to his way of thinking: there was good and there was evil, and it wasn’t hard to tell the difference.” Then Duffy added: “Privately, Bush even talked of being chosen by the grace of God to lead at that moment."

So Bush is chosen by God, but not by the U.S. Congress and not by the United Nations, to lead an invasion of Iraq. During the Vietnam War, evidently Bush was chosen by God not to lead anyone into that war, least of all himself. Welcome to America’s Chicken Heart administration: chicken when they were asked to fight a war that they themselves believed in, and now all heart to send other young men off to a war that only they believe in.

And just a few days ago, The New York Times reported a new Bush doctrine whereby the chosen by God Bush can unilaterally declare war on any country he deems is run by evil-doers. Today Iraq, maybe next week Madagascar. Next month, possibly Philadelphia.

Let’s face it, our chosen by God leader is in a modern Christian crusade frame of mind. He’s probably riding his lead pony right now around the White House war room. A year ago, God’s choice used the word "crusade" to describe his War on Terrorism, which knocked the Arab world right off its camel. Although Bush stumbled his way through Yale and slept through Harvard Business School -- Yale produced one long hangover for Bush -- the Arab heathens haven’t had excessive consumption and innate laziness blackout their history. Christian Crusades are still unpopular in the Middle East.

With 9/11 as Revelation, the President of the United States, personally chosen by God, is about to lead us, sisters and brothers, saints and sinners, into what he believes will be Armageddon. In the New Testament, Armageddon is described in Revelations “as the place where the kings of the Earth under demonic leadership will wage war on the forces of God at the end of world history. God’s heavenly armies will defeat the demonic forces of evil.”

Bush has singled out the "evil doer;" co-ideologue Pat Robertson can’t shut up about Armageddon, which will bring on the Second Coming and the conversion of all the Jews to Jesus. The direct mail campaign of "Jews for Jesus" is right in step; cowriter Rick Friedman is urged to "take Christ into your heart before Armageddon happens or you’re doomed!” Actually, if we don’t get this nut out of the White House we’re all doomed.

If the chosen by God George Bush invades demonic Iraq he may very well ignite a larger war in the Middle East that will pull in other Arab states and Israel, leading us to the conclusion of Armageddon with both God’s forces and Satan’s army all going down the toilet of defeat. And just think, all of this from a man who can’t spell “banana.” So sisters and brothers, saints and sinners, hang on because revelation is bringing a revolution and we just may end up back in the Stone Age.

By the way, if you’re not the fatalistic type, you could get off your spreading computer butt and raise some hell! Bush might be chosen by God, but this is still a democracy.

Note: Rick Friedman is contributing editor and Stewart Nusbaumer is editor of Intervention Magazine. Both would like to thank West End Bar for its gracious, copious support of this writing project.

http://interventionmag.com/cms/index.php?n...article&sid=190


user posted image




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Sep 5 2006, 02:03 AM
Quote Post
bump.gif




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top
Guest


Unregistered




Mood: 



Posted: Dec 18 2006, 04:39 PM
Quote Post
a good read. to bad the author turns me off by constanly using the terrible term retards! my son who is developmentally disabled has been called that many times, by ignorant people. funny this guy is smart enough to put togather a good read but to dumb to realize by using such base name calling he makes himself look like an ass!


Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Dec 18 2006, 08:33 PM
Quote Post
Which article are you referring to?

There are 3 articles.




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0629 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."
~ James A. Garfield, President of the United States


MORE POLITICAL ART

"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
~ Amschel Mayer Rothschild