Latest Shouts In The Shoutbox -- View The Shoutbox
The shoutbox is currently offline!

[ Smilies | BBCodes ]

     
 
Click Here and visit PuPPs FREE StuFF

This website contains controversial information that may be disturbing to some viewers.
The theories, conclusions and commentaries are presented in an attempt to reveal the hidden truths.
It is up to the viewer to determine what they choose to believe after evaluating all available sources of information.

 
     

NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION
Does your government represent your best interests?


     
 
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
~ Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.



POLITICAL ART GALLERY



IMPORTANT TOPICS

1. U.S. NEWS MEDIA CAN LEGALLY LIE TO YOU
There is no law preventing the U.S. news media from intentionally lying to the public. Whistle blowers and honest reporters are fired for telling the truth.

2. FLUORIDE IS A TOXIN/POISON
Read the Poison Warning label on your toothpaste, then call the 800# and ask;
"Why do you put poison in my toothpaste?"

3. NEW FLU VACCINE IS LOADED WITH MERCURY
by Dr. Joseph Mercola

4. PEDOPHILES IN HIGH PLACES
Also: Conspiracy of Silence Video

5. ASPARTAME IS HARMFUL
Equal, Nutra-Sweet and over 6000 food and beverage products contain Aspartame

6. On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 (2 Trillion) in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for.
Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the [9/11] attack on the World Trade Center and The Pentagon the following morning would assure that the story remained buried.


http://drinkingwaterlosangeles.com
Serving the greater Los Angeles area,
Los Angeles Drinking Water is proud to offer Reverse Osmosis filtration systems
that remove trace elements such as arsenic, mercury, lead and fluoride
which are known to be in Los Angeles tap water according to
the 2013 DWP Water Quality report.
POLITICAL ART GALLERY









"If our nation is ever taken over, it will be taken over from within."
~ James Madison, President of the United States

  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> The StarChild Project, Unknown species of human-like beings?


Intentions
**
Group: Members
Posts: 30
Member No.: 132
Mood: 



Posted: May 2 2004, 12:25 PM
Quote Post
See http://www.starchildproject.com/

For this page, see http://www.starchildproject.com/analysis-02.html

The STARCHILD PROJECT Data Site

A Condensed Analysis Of Two Unusual Skulls of Uncertain Origin

By: Lloyd Pye


Overview:

Sixty to seventy years ago an American girl of Mexican heritage in her late teens (15 to 18) was taken by her parents to visit relatives living in a small rural village 100 miles southwest of Chihuahua, Mexico. The girl was forbidden to enter any of the area's numerous caves and mine tunnels, but like most teenagers, she went exploring.


At the back of a mine tunnel she found a complete human skeleton lying on the ground's surface. Beside it, sticking up out of the ground, was a malformed skeletal hand entwined in one of the human skeleton's upper arms. The girl proceeded to scrape the dirt off a shallow grave to reveal a buried skeleton smaller than the human one and also malformed. She did not specify the type or degree of any of the "malformations."

The girl recovered both skulls and kept them for the remainder of her life. Upon her death they were passed to an American man, who maintained possession for five years before passing them to the American couple who now control them.


Skull #1 (Mystery Skull):


Skull suturing and baby teeth in a detached piece of maxilla (upper jaw and palate) indicate death around 5 years of age. The face is missing from the upper bridge of the nose to the foramen magnum (the hole where the spine enters the skull), but the cranium and most of both eye orbits (the external parts of the sockets) are intact.

This skull's degree of humanity is at issue because several aspects of its morphology defy categorizing as genetic defect (inherited), congenital deformation (birth defect), or inflicted deformity (cranial binding).

Skull #2 (Human Skull):


A human skull assumed to be Amerindian (an Indian from North or South America) because the rear of its cranium exhibits the flattening that results from being carried in infancy on a cradle board. Tooth wear suggests age at death was around 25 years, plus or minus five. Its smallish size and other reduced points of reference indicate it will likely prove to be female.

Binding:


Experts suggest the child's high degree of occipital (rear-skull) deformity would most likely have resulted from the cranial binding practiced by primitive cultures around the world. However, such binding never extends below the inion
(the bump at the back of the head) because the human neck begins just below that point. Furthermore, squeezing a skull's upper bones out of their natural shape leaves them permanently separated, which results in a life-long "soft spot" at the top of the head.

The child's skull is well-sutured (no soft spot), with none of the distortions normally caused by binding. Furthermore, the extent of rear flattening extends well past the inion, which has become slightly concave. This indicates a strong force other than binding (i.e. pathology or a natural design) must have caused the occipital's extensive deformation.

Brain Volume:


Though markedly different in shape, the skulls are roughly the same size. However, they exhibit a stunning difference in brain volume. The average volume for a human brain is 1400 cubic centimeters (cc). The volume of the human skull
is 1200 cc, typical for a small human. In contrast, the volume of the child's skull is 1600 cc, which is 200 cc beyond the average for adult humans. And had it lived to become an adult, its brain capacity would have grown to 1800 cc or
more, well beyond the human average.

In paleoanthropology (the study of ancient animals) a 200 cc increase in brain capacity of a human type creature warrants the naming of an entirely new species. Homo Erectus averages 200 cc more than Homo Habilis; Homo
Archaic is 200 cc more than Erectus; Neanderthal is 200 cc more than Archaic. Thus, this child might well represent an unknown species of human-like beings.

Weight:


An average human skull weighs 2.2 pounds (lbs.). The adult's skull (which is missing its lower jawbone and teeth) weighs 1 lb., 13.4 ounces. Including the child skull's piece of detached maxilla (upper jaw), it weighs only 13.5 ounces. Because it is roughly the size of the adult skull, its bone has to be significantly lighter than typical human bone.

Symmetry:


The child's skull has a high degree of symmetry (similarity on both sides). Usually cranial pathologies will cause differences in degree on either side of the head, along with other distortions. Thus, it is highly unlikely a cranium so clearly aberrant would exhibit such startling symmetry throughout




Sutures:



A CAT scan has shown that none of the sutures between the bones in the child's skull have sealed themselves off from further growth. Nearly all examples of congenital deformity exhibit some degree of premature sealing of cranial sutures. This makes it highly unlikely, if not virtually impossible, for the child's skull to be the result of deformity. It seems to have grown naturally into the shape is had taken.




The Eyes:


Normal human eye sockets have a recessed (5 cm) conical shape with optic nerves and optic fissures at the inner rear quadrant of the cone. The child's eye sockets have a shallow (3 cm) scalloped shape with optic nerves and optic
fissures moved down and away to the inner bottom. Also, the inner surface of both sockets have incredibly subtle terrain shifts that are impossible to explain in any way other than genetic design.

The shape and width of the eye orbits (the outer edges of the sockets) are equally divergent. The adult's have the vaguely rectangular shape of normal humans, while the child's are shaped like a lopsided oval. The adult's are typically
rounded along the top of the rectangle, while the upper part of the child's oval has a clearly definable edge.

The Ears:


The child's ear canals are clearly visible on both sides of its skull. They seem normal in shape and size and angle of entry, but a recent CAT scan revealed that they are larger and have more depth than normal human inner ears. There is no way to know if an external ear was present or what it may have looked like.

The Sinuses:


The child had small maxillary (cheek) sinuses but no trace of frontal sinus cavities. While extremely rare, this condition is supposedly known among both humans and primates.


The Foramen Magnum:


The foramen magnum is the hole at the base of the skull where the spinal column connects with the brain. In normal humans the foramen is positioned slightly rear of center to balance the hollow-filled front face against the brain-filled
occipital area. The extensive reconfiguration of the child's skull has somehow caused its foramen magnum to be shifted to a central point that provides much better balance between its rear brain area, and its face and forebrain.

The Necks:


Typical human neck attachments begin at the inion, the bump in the middle of the occipital bone, and sweep out in a semicircle that reaches to just behind the ears and converges at the foramen magnum. The distance from any part of
the semicircle to the foramen opening averages 5 to 6 centimeters.

In the child's skull a shallow arc extends about 3 centimeters from the foramen hole, while the inion has somehow become slightly concave. Such a drastic reduction in attachment area means the neck supporting the child's head
must have been from 1/2 to 1/3 that of a normal human. Such thin necks are consistently described as hallmarks of certain alien types (Grays), and of Gray-human hybrids.

Chewing Muscles:


In the child, the area available for attaching chewing muscles is every bit as reduced as the attachment area for its neck muscles. And though they are called "chewing" muscles, they are actually used for connecting and holding the
lower face to the skull. Based on such a reduced connection area, the amount of mandible (jawbone) these muscles could have secured must have been greatly reduced.

Human-Alien Hybrids:


Many abductees and contactees allege that aliens (most often "Grays") are conducting genetic experiments that produce hybrids between themselves and humans. The results of these unions are consistently described as looking
far more human than alien, but with stark bulges in the parietal bones; shallow eye sockets; a greatly reduced lower face; a thin neck able to easily support a well-balanced head; and ears seen as markedly lower and smaller (or
missing entirely) relative to human ears.

The eyes of Grays are consistently described and depicted as large black teardrop shapes that wrap horizontally across the middle of the face. If those large orbs are indeed their visual mechanisms, it would argue against the child's
eyes being related to them. However, in the "Alien Autopsy" film the alien being dissected has the "standard" Gray eyes until the doctor performing the autopsy lifts them off and shows them to actually be dark, flexible coverings like large contact lenses or shades. Underneath those lenses were round, bulging eyes with plenty of white showing around dark irises. Those eyes would fit quite well in the reduced eye sockets of the child.

The Star Being Legends:


These are well-known, well-regarded legends with roots spreading throughout Central and South America. They are pervasive and long-standing (two centuries or more), and in general state that on a regular basis "Star Beings" come down from the heavens and impregnate females in remote, isolated villages. The women carry their "starchildren" to term, then raise them to age six or so. At that point the Star Beings return to collect their progeny and remove them to places, and for purposes, not clearly outlined in the legends, though improving a stagnated gene pool is often mentioned as a motivation.

The Non-Traditional Scenario:


Many "intuitives" and "sensitives" feel the adult skeleton was a female and the child was hers, a human-alien hybrid created by a union between her and a Star Being. Some feel the mother had learned the Star Beings were returning to
take her child from her, which she refused to contemplate. Panic-stricken and filled with dread, she took her child and fled her village, seeking refuge in the hidden mine tunnel. There she killed it and buried it in a shallow grave, leaving
one of its hands out of the ground to hold onto. Then she took a fatal dose of poison and lay down beside her child to die.

DNA Testing:


Inside the nucleus of human cells is found nuclear DNA, which is a combination of both parents. Floating outside the nucleus in each of our cells are tiny bits of stray DNA called "mitochondria."

Because mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) passes solely through females, the first test of the child's mtDNA will provide a genetic snapshot of its mother. If she was human, that snapshot will say "human." However, since the test says nothing about the father, that does not preclude it being a human-alien hybrid.

Furthermore, testing might indicate an utterly non-human origin, either by having
entirely absent mtDNA or by having a structure markedly different from human mtDNA.

Nothing is likely to be definitive about the origin of the child's skull until its nuclear DNA can be tested. Because the skull is considered technically "ancient" (over 50 years of age), recovering nuclear DNA will be difficult and costly. Luckily, we have what is most required for such a test, which is teeth. The pulp in teeth resists deterioration better than any other part of the body, so that is where we must look for nuclear DNA.

Worldwide there are only a handful of laboratories capable of sequencing ancient nuclear DNA, and all such processes are time-consuming, highly technical, and very expensive. Thus, we cannot contract to have this testing done until funding is available to pay for it, but we will announce all such results as soon as they are available.


Conclusion:


Mainstream Position:

* Pathology--genetic (inherited) or congenital (birth defect)--is the standard explanation for any human-like skullb that does not fit the "normal" human mold.In the hands of scientists dedicated to pounding square pegs into the round hole of conventional thinking, pathologycan be made to cover virtually any deviation.

* In truth, a unique combination of extraordinary pathological disorders is a possible explanation for the many aberrations evident in the child's skull. Absent overwhelming evidence to the contrary, mainstream science will insist the skull has resulted from nothing more than multiple pathological defects.

* This opinion will always dominate any others because of the combined academic credentials of those who will profess it. This is reality; we all know it.


Points Supporting Non-Earth Origin:


The long-standing Star Being legends of Central and South America provide a plausible mechanism for how a highly abnormal skull (relative to humans) might have been biologically created rather than genetically or congenitally malformed, or physically manipulated by deliberate deformation (binding).

Such immense deformation across the entire occipital (rear) and parietal (upper side) areas of the skull could not result from binding without deformation being visible in the frontal area, which is not evident.

Birth defects across the entire occipital and parietal areas, while not impossible, seem highly unlikely because of the remarkable symmetry exhibited in all areas of the skull, including those effected by the deformations.

The terrain of the bone in the eye sockets contains incredibly subtle indentations and ridges that are perfectly symmetrical in both sockets, which simply have to have been formed by genetic directions rather than by deformations.

The rear deformation extends from the crown to very near the foramen magnum, an area impossible to reach by any binding device due to the thick neck muscles (even in a child) that surround and support the skull-spine connection.
Head binding cannot extend below the inion (the bump at the back of the head).
Head binding leaves a gaping opening at the top where skull bones fail to fuse.

The bottom line is that even though the skull's highly unusual characteristics demand an open-minded approach to it, mainstream science will reject it outright until forced by DNA evidence to do otherwise. Indeed, it could turn out to be nothing more than a butt-ugly kid with an extraordinary combination of cranial deformities never seen before. But it could also have been the result of a human-alien union, or an outright alien with no connection to humanity at all.

Only time and testing will tell which possibility is correct.




Copyright 1999-2002

For information about Lloyd Pye and his book,
"Everything You Know Is Wrong---Book One: Human Origins"
Please visit: www.lloydpye.com
Starchild home page


PMEmail Poster
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: May 3 2004, 11:51 AM
Quote Post
STARCHILD SKULL and HUMAN SKULL COMPARISON

user posted image




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Forever in Blue Jeans
****
Group: Members
Posts: 215
Member No.: 13
Mood: 



Posted: May 15 2004, 06:30 PM
Quote Post
But it could also have been the result of a human-alien union, or an outright alien with no connection to humanity at all.


I'll take that for 5, Parsingman!




--------------------
Maintaining my level in the atmosfear.
PM
Top
Whisper


Unregistered




Mood: 



Posted: May 16 2004, 03:39 AM
Quote Post
I tend to go with the latter cloud ... I don't know why, just have a feeling. I also was watching something on Discovery or one of those channels, they try to debunk the shapes of the skulls by saying that the people bound a board to thier heads and thats what gave them the elongated skull or squashed skulls. I totally do not buy that in the least bit. rolleyes.gif


Top
Guest


Unregistered




Mood: 



Posted: May 16 2004, 03:42 AM
Quote Post
It seems like an age has passed waiting for the tests to be run.

I would've thought that with all the interest this has sparked they would've started by now.

What's the hold-up?


Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Jan 26 2005, 11:47 AM
Quote Post
Here's some more StarChild skull images.


user posted image




user posted image




user posted image




I agree with Whisper, the original elongated/conehead skulls were a genetic condition.

The later natives/offspring tried to emulate their gods by performing head binding.




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: Jan 26 2005, 11:50 AM
Quote Post
Also, take note of the closely set eyes and pay attn to 'certain' actors and tv news reporters and or/weather guys and govt officials today who have that same characteristic.





--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


Master Of His Domain
******
Group: Admin
Posts: 12736
Member No.: 8
Mood: 



Posted: May 15 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote Post
QUOTE
The Starchild Skull
© Lloyd Pye
Starchild News
Starchild Update from Lloyd Pye
Dateline: Thursday, May 12, 2005

By: LLOYD PYE
By: Author and Investigator

It is exactly 90 days since the last Starchild update, and much has happened to it and to me. In late February I moved from London to the U.S. because the cost of living here is substantially less. Also, I returned with a new partner, Amy Vickers, an Aussie lass I met in London. We intend to be happy and productive.

Productive is the key word. I'm here to write a book about my six-plus years as caretaker of the Starchild skull. I expect to finish all of it by the end of this yearóexcept the final chapter. That will be revealed to all of us over the next few months as the final rounds of technical testing play themselves out.

Another major event for me is that my personal website, http://www.lloydpye.com, has been completely overhauled for the first time in seven years. It has entered the 21st century with a dazzling array of new pages and features. The most important addition is 15 slide shows of about 10 slides each. Some are more than 10, some less, but all are designed to graphically illustrate the differences between Intervention Theory and Darwinism or Creationism.

Together, those slides make an overwhelming case for outside Intervention is all aspects of life on Earth. Let me politely but firmly urge everyone to find time to view those few dozen slides and read the few lines of text under each. Those images and that information will shake at least some of your mental foundations and rattle around inside for a long time to come - guaranteed.

There are, of course, other pages of interest. I have my three best screenplays posted with thumbnail descriptions, detailed synopses, and the full text of each script. Each one is topnotch, having been optioned multiple times by Hollywood producers. That means they seriously tried to arrange financing for them, but none was ever successful. You want a hard game? Movies are a hard game.

Something else new is a humor page. That one you have to see for yourself. Essays and short stories remain, but with additions and subtractions from the old pages. My books are presented, the two available now and the four that will be available as Amy formats them for Print-On-Demand. If any synopses or sample chapters ring your bell, let us know and we'll let you know when it's ready. Oh, and there is new biography text and a new photo with it. That obscured one in front of the pyramids is finally history.

With that said, let's turn to the Starchild. When last I reported in February, we had been gifted with enough funding to continue testing its bone for the next six to ten months, expecting definitive results to be achieved in that time. We remain hopeful that will be the case. Further testing is underway, and will continue until nothing more of significance can be accomplished.

Let's pause for a quick but critical review of our recent past so we can better envision our potential future. When the Starchild's DNA was tested, its mitochondrial DNA (very durable) could be easily recovered. That revealed its mother was a typical Amerindian who would have lived in northwestern Mexico 900 years ago. However, despite being well preserved by spending nine centuries sheltered from outside elements in a mine tunnel under a thin coat of dirt, the Starchild's nuclear DNA (relatively fragile), containing its father's genetic package, could not be recovered - in four attempts! Why not? Because the primers were not picking it up.

Nuclear DNA primers are designed to recover from humans, not alien-human hybrids. So while the Starchild's entire nuclear DNA package could well be recoverable (and very likely is), there is no way to go after it until geneticists WANT to, enough to design new primers to search beyond strictly human parameters. This effort could be paid for with a small fortune, but since we continue to struggle merely to survive, this is not in our immediate future.

The lack of suitable primers leaves us holding a kind of genetic bag that has to be filled in other creative ways. One of those ways is to break the Starchild bone down into its constituent elements, taking it apart almost molecule by molecule to compare it with a similar breakdown of human bone. This is happening now.

As of late last week, much of the chemistry analysis had been done on the inorganic constituents. When that is complete, analysis of organic constituents will begin. When both are completed, those doing the analyses should have a much clearer picture of what is and isn't human-like about the Starchild's bone. From there we will follow their advice regarding where and how to proceed.

I plan to begin actually writing the book about the Starchild in July. Recently I've been collating notes, arranging them in their proper sequences. I also intend to ask a couple dozen people who were closely involved in it in one way or another (you know who you are) to send me an essay about their experience with it. I will insert those comments throughout the book so it's not just me, me, me for 300 pages. Other voices should be heard, and they will be.

Between now and July, I have two major speaking engagements in Washington State, both highlighted in the "News" page on my new website. On Saturday, May 28th, I speak in Bellingham at the Sasquatch Research Conference. This one is about Hominoids, and I intend it to be one of the most important ever given in this field. Seriously. If you know anyone in the Seattle-Bellingham area, please give them a heads-up about it. I'm one of a dozen speakers, and the cost is only $40 for the weekend. Contact Jason Valenti at 360-758-2443, or go to http://www.sasquatchresearch.com.

The following weekend I'll be at the 5th Annual UFO/Paranormal Conference AND the 1st Annual Sasquatch Symposium in Seattle. I'm the first speaker on Saturday morning, and Iíll be giving a visual tour of what we've been through and where we stand at that point with the Starchild. It will be the most up-to-date information I can provide, and by then there should be a completion of at least the inorganic testing. If you want to know about it first, be there in Seattle, Saturday morning, June 4th. Contact Charlette Lefevre at clefevre@oz.net or go to http://www.seattlechatclub.org.

Okay, that's it for now. Thanks for listening, and be sure to check out the remarkable changes at http://www.lloydpye.com. For that I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Mark LaRose in Louisiana for designing the original format, to Andrew Johnson in England for formatting the slide shows, and to my partner Amy for doing everything else.

Lloyd Pye

lloydpye@cox.net
http://www.phenomenamagazine.com/0/editori..._id=22&sub_id=0




--------------------
QUOTE
"Ye shall know them by their fruits"
~ Matthew 7:16

"Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
~ Buddha
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top


a pyroclastic surge o' Love
****
Group: Members
Posts: 426
Member No.: 361
Mood: 



Posted: Jan 5 2007, 09:43 AM
Quote Post
Starchild Skull Update 11/9/2006

Starchild Skull - Paranormal News

QUOTE
We’ve known for a long time that the 900-year-old skull (verified by Carbon-14 testing) has bone that is uniformly much thinner and much lighter than it should be, and that it was inexplicably much harder than normal. Now we think we know why. There are unprecedented "fibers," for lack of a better term, embedded in the matrix of the bone itself! Nothing like it has ever been seen before, but there it is, on the website and on the NG show.

In addition, a second breakthrough was the discovery that inside many of the skull’s cancellous holes (the places where marrow exists) was a reddish "residue" of some kind, every bit as unprecedented as the fibers embedded in the matrix. (Absolutely nothing at all should be in cancellous holes 900 years after death.) So chalk these up as two of the most profound mysteries buried within the deepening mystery of the Starchild itself, and then brace for the most significant revelation yet--the DNA testing.


Peace, Gan
pinkelephant.gif




--------------------
" In PuPP We Trust ! " user posted image



user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.0364 ]   [ 17 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."
~ James A. Garfield, President of the United States


MORE POLITICAL ART

"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
~ Amschel Mayer Rothschild